home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   BBS_CARNIVAL      Your BBS software rules and others suck      5,461 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 5,023 of 5,461   
   Rob Swindell to Dennis Scott   
   BBS Software Timeout Values   
   08 Apr 23 19:14:23   
   
   TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 11170.bbs_carn@1:103/705 28978121   
   REPLY: 11169.bbs_carn@1:103/705 28977d25   
   PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/fcf4a0012 Apr  4 2023 GCC 12.2.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/f4dcbf61d Apr  5 2023 GCC 12.2.0   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: VERT   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104   
     Re: BBS Software Timeout Values   
     By: Dennis Scott to Rob Swindell on Sat Apr 08 2023 06:57 pm   
      
    >   Re: BBS Software Timeout Values   
    >   By: Rob Swindell to Dennis Scott on Thu Apr 06 2023 05:01 pm   
    >   
    >  > Current versions of Synchronet support up to 250 nodes. Realistically,   
    >  > nobody configures anywhere near that many nodes mainly because   
    >  > configuring door games to support dozens of nodes (for many multinode   
    >  > doors, anyway), is a big hassle. It's much easier to just enforce a   
    >  > maximum duration of user inactivity and keep the number of configured   
    >  > nodes to some a number you'd reasonably expect to need for *active* user   
    >  > connections.   
    >   
    > Is it realistic to have the BBS software dynamically open and close nodes as   
    > necessary, similiar to the way that Apache does?   
      
   Apache web server? It doesn't have the concept of "nodes" or "door games".   
      
    > If so, a Sysop could assign   
    > say 5 nodes or so for doors and the rest of the nodes be dynamic if   
    > necessary.   
      
   Oh, I suppose anything's possible. But it's most mult-user BBSes are designed   
   in a way that when a user connects, they're assigned an "open node" and have   
   exclusive use of that node until they disconnect/log-off and at that time the   
   node is "closed".   
      
    > What if there was a way for each Sysop to have an income from their BBS?   
    > Maybe not getting rich but paying for their equipment and bandwidth, etc. I   
    > think there is a way to do it and still keep the BBS system that's been   
    > around for decades.   
      
   You mean if something like paypal existed? It does. And sysops could require   
   payment for access if they wanted to. I don't understand your point.   
   --    
                                               digital man (rob)   
      
   Synchronet "Real Fact" #13:   
   Synchronet was the first BBS software to ship with internal QWK networking   
   Norco, CA WX: 61.9øF, 72.0% humidity, 3 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux   
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 123/131 124/5016   
   SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 206 275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/550 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038   
   SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45   
   SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/267 280 281 412 418 509 712/848   
   PATH: 103/705 280/464 633/280 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca