Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BBS_CARNIVAL    |    Your BBS software rules and others suck    |    5,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 5,023 of 5,461    |
|    Rob Swindell to Dennis Scott    |
|    BBS Software Timeout Values    |
|    08 Apr 23 19:14:23    |
      TZUTC: -0700       MSGID: 11170.bbs_carn@1:103/705 28978121       REPLY: 11169.bbs_carn@1:103/705 28977d25       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/fcf4a0012 Apr 4 2023 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/f4dcbf61d Apr 5 2023 GCC 12.2.0       COLS: 80       BBSID: VERT       CHRS: CP437 2       NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104        Re: BBS Software Timeout Values        By: Dennis Scott to Rob Swindell on Sat Apr 08 2023 06:57 pm               > Re: BBS Software Timeout Values        > By: Rob Swindell to Dennis Scott on Thu Apr 06 2023 05:01 pm        >        > > Current versions of Synchronet support up to 250 nodes. Realistically,        > > nobody configures anywhere near that many nodes mainly because        > > configuring door games to support dozens of nodes (for many multinode        > > doors, anyway), is a big hassle. It's much easier to just enforce a        > > maximum duration of user inactivity and keep the number of configured        > > nodes to some a number you'd reasonably expect to need for *active* user        > > connections.        >        > Is it realistic to have the BBS software dynamically open and close nodes as        > necessary, similiar to the way that Apache does?              Apache web server? It doesn't have the concept of "nodes" or "door games".               > If so, a Sysop could assign        > say 5 nodes or so for doors and the rest of the nodes be dynamic if        > necessary.              Oh, I suppose anything's possible. But it's most mult-user BBSes are designed       in a way that when a user connects, they're assigned an "open node" and have       exclusive use of that node until they disconnect/log-off and at that time the       node is "closed".               > What if there was a way for each Sysop to have an income from their BBS?        > Maybe not getting rich but paying for their equipment and bandwidth, etc. I        > think there is a way to do it and still keep the BBS system that's been        > around for decades.              You mean if something like paypal existed? It does. And sysops could require       payment for access if they wanted to. I don't understand your point.       --         digital man (rob)              Synchronet "Real Fact" #13:       Synchronet was the first BBS software to ship with internal QWK networking       Norco, CA WX: 61.9øF, 72.0% humidity, 3 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs       --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux        * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 18/200 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/201 123/131 124/5016       SEEN-BY: 129/305 153/757 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/110 111 112 113 206 275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470       SEEN-BY: 229/550 664 700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 282/1038       SEEN-BY: 292/8125 301/1 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45       SEEN-BY: 460/58 633/267 280 281 412 418 509 712/848       PATH: 103/705 280/464 633/280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca