TZUTC: -0500   
   MSGID: 1504.fidonet_bbscarni@1:154/70 26da69cd   
   REPLY: 1:229/426 39C46DBC   
   PID: Synchronet 3.19c-Linux master/6de0ebc0d May  6 2022 GCC 9.4.0   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.15-Linux master/6de0ebc0d May  6 2022 GCC 9.4.0   
   BBSID: RDOMENTR   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   NOTE: SlyEdit 1.76 (2022-03-05) (DCT style)   
    NA> It likely stems from the same strawman argument that if its open-source,   
    NA> its somehow "better" or "more secure". You see this all the time with real   
    NA> Linux fanatics and they move the goalposts when asked if they will   
    NA> personally audit all 250,000+ lines of that Linux kernel looking for   
    NA> exploits.    
      
   That's kind of a strawman too. Improving things by them being open source   
   doesn't have to mean auditing every line of code.   
      
   I've personally submitted a few Synchronet issues because of oddities in the   
   code that were then patched.    
      
      
   - Andre   
   --- SBBSecho 3.15-Linux   
    * Origin: Radio Mentor BBS - bbs.radiomentor.org (1:154/70)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 15/0 18/0 200 50/109 90/1 105/81 106/201 114/705   
   SEEN-BY: 116/116 120/302 340 616 123/0 10 25 115 120 126 131 180 200   
   SEEN-BY: 123/755 129/215 305 330 331 135/300 153/250 757 7715 154/0   
   SEEN-BY: 154/10 30 40 50 70 700 218/700 840 220/70 90 221/1 6 222/2   
   SEEN-BY: 226/17 18 30 100 227/114 229/110 111 206 317 400 424 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/428 452 470 550 664 700 240/1120 250/1 5 8 266/512 267/800   
   SEEN-BY: 275/1000 280/464 282/1038 298/25 299/6 300/4 301/1 113 305/3   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/219 322/757 335/364 341/66 342/200 396/45 460/58   
   SEEN-BY: 467/888 633/280 712/848 1321 770/1 2320/105 3634/0 12 15   
   SEEN-BY: 3634/24 27 50 119 4500/1 5001/100 5005/49 5019/40 5020/715   
   SEEN-BY: 5020/1042 4441 5054/8 5058/104 5064/56 5083/444 5090/958   
   PATH: 154/70 30 10 3634/12 5020/1042 301/1 221/6 218/840 770/1   
   PATH: 317/3 229/426