Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BBS_CARNIVAL    |    Your BBS software rules and others suck    |    5,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,805 of 5,461    |
|    Deon George to Mark Hofmann    |
|    Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus.    |
|    21 Jun 20 08:17:33    |
      TZUTC: 1000       MSGID: 221.fdn_bbscarni@3:633/509 2353c1da       REPLY: 1:261/1304 5EEE0FC0       PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux May 22 2020 GCC 8.3.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.173 May 22 2020 GCC 8.3.0       CHRS: CP437 2       NOTE: SlyEdit 1.73 (2020-03-31) (ICE style)        Re: Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus.        By: Mark Hofmann to Deon George on Sat Jun 20 2020 09:31 am               MH> The other question would be when the telnet negotiation happens, is this        MH> for both telnet sessions in the double telnet situation or just the new        MH> one connecting?              So the assumption I've been working on, is that by "double telnet", you       actually mean "two telnet sessions" right?              If this is true, then each session negotatiates what happens on that session.       So if one session wants to go 8 bit (to do binary transfers), the other       session needs to do the same. But the problem that probably exists, is nothing       is triggering the other session to do it...              ...лоеп              ... Diplomacy is the art of letting someone else have your way.       --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux        * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 120/340 601 123/131 226/30 227/114 702       SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 452 664 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 317/3       SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 633/0 267 280 281 412 416 509 712/848       PATH: 633/509 280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca