Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
| BBS_CARNIVAL | Your BBS software rules and others suck | 5,461 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 3,799 of 5,461 |
| Deon George to Mark Hofmann |
| Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus. |
| 20 Jun 20 09:54:10 |
TZUTC: 1000 MSGID: 215.fdn_bbscarni@3:633/509 235286f9 REPLY: 1:261/1304 5EECB5FD PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux May 22 2020 GCC 8.3.0 TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.173 May 22 2020 GCC 8.3.0 CHRS: CP437 2 NOTE: SlyEdit 1.73 (2020-03-31) (ICE style) Re: Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus. By: Mark Hofmann to Deon George on Fri Jun 19 2020 08:56 am MH> Is there any harm to always forcing a binary connection for telnet? That MH> way it would be covered either way? Not sure what effect that would have MH> on regular text. During a telnet session, the server and client exchange information on demand - "Telnet IAC", which you would loose if it was in a permanent binary session. These IAC commands return cursor positions, echo mode, terminal info, etc... ...лоеп ... I've got Parkinson's disease. And he's got mine. --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509) SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 120/340 601 123/131 226/30 227/114 702 SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 452 664 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 317/3 SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 633/0 267 280 281 412 416 509 712/848 PATH: 633/509 280 229/426 |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca