Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BBS_CARNIVAL    |    Your BBS software rules and others suck    |    5,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,794 of 5,461    |
|    Deon George to Mark Hofmann    |
|    Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus.    |
|    19 Jun 20 16:03:29    |
      TZUTC: 1000       MSGID: 210.fdn_bbscarni@3:633/509 23518c03       REPLY: 1:261/1304 5EEB66E6       PID: Synchronet 3.18a-Linux May 22 2020 GCC 8.3.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Linux r3.173 May 22 2020 GCC 8.3.0       CHRS: CP437 2       NOTE: SlyEdit 1.73 (2020-03-31) (ICE style)        Re: Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus.        By: Mark Hofmann to Deon George on Thu Jun 18 2020 09:06 am               MH> If telnet xfers work without the double telnet situation, could that still        MH> mean both streams could be an issue?               Yes - if one of the streams doesnt negotiate 8bit binary mode.              So if you have:               A <---> B B <---> C              So "B" is both a client and a server (or a server running a client telnet).              If "C" says "lets go binary", the "B client" probably says "OK", but it       probably doesnt tell the "B server" to negotiate binary mode with "A".              ...лоеп              ... MONEY TALKS...but all mine ever says is GOODBYE!       --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux        * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 120/340 601 123/131 226/30 227/114 702       SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 452 664 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 317/3       SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 633/0 267 280 281 412 416 509 712/848       PATH: 633/509 280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca