Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BBS_CARNIVAL    |    Your BBS software rules and others suck    |    5,461 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3,792 of 5,461    |
|    Mark Hofmann to Deon George    |
|    Re: Question for telnet/BBS gurus.    |
|    18 Jun 20 09:06:46    |
      MSGID: 1:261/1304 5EEB66E6       PID: WWIV BBS v. 424        TID: WWIVTOSS v. 1.52               DG> It would probably be because one of the (telnet) streams (or both), are       DG> not put into "binary mode" - and thus the telnet client or server is       DG> interpreting some of the binary chars that would be sent.              If telnet xfers work without the double telnet situation, could that still       mean both streams could be an issue?               Not 100% sure, but the only reports I'm aware of this happening is when using       the SIO drivers as the second destination. They work fine as the first       destination.               Since there is no way to make changes to SIO these days, hoping there is       another way to get this working.              - Mark              --- WWIVToss v.1.52         * Origin: http://www.weather-station.org * Bel Air, MD -USA (1:261/1304.0)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 114/705 120/340 601 123/131 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 227/702 229/101 424 426 452 664 1014 240/5832 249/206 317       SEEN-BY: 249/400 298/25 305/3 317/3 322/757 342/200 633/280       PATH: 261/1304 1 266/512 261/38 712/848 770/1 317/3 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca