home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   BBS_CARNIVAL      Your BBS software rules and others suck      5,461 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 2,640 of 5,461   
   Sean Dennis to Eric Oulashin   
   Re: Favorite BBS software   
   11 May 16 21:57:22   
   
   -=> Eric Oulashin wrote to All <=-   
      
    EO> I'm just curious what everyone's favorite BBS software is?  It's not my   
    EO> I've considered eventually moving my BBS to Linux (although not likely   
    EO> any time soon), and I've heard Synchronet has some support for using   
    EO> DOSEMU for 16-bit DOS doors, which could make that a bit easier.  When   
      
   I am running MBSE BBS which has full support for DOS doors.  Running a   
   Linux-based BBS can be a rather steep learning curve but once it's done,   
   you'll enjoy your system and BBS.  MBSE was never a "finished" product but   
   it is open source and there's a few of us who poke at the code occasionally,   
   mainly Andrew Leary at this time.   
      
   MBSE uses DOSemu, but my DOSemu setup is from the git master and highly   
   modified for my system.  I use PC-DOS 2000 for my DOS setup and the doors   
   work fine.  Scrabble gives me fits, but I think it's because of custom   
   FOSSIL code that wasn't really well-written...something I can't do anything   
   about.   
      
   Anyhow, after using about 40 different BBS packages over the years, I've   
   seen many pros and cons to each package.  Really, it comes down to what you   
   like and what you want out of your hobby.  If it's not fun, then there's   
   something wrong (has always been my motto).   
      
   As for Linux-based BBS software, there's Synchronet, Mystic, MBSE, BBBS,   
   etheral (I think?), Waffle, Pyffle, and a whole plethora of others that I   
   don't remember.  The first three are actively being supported and BBBS is   
   still supported although development is slow from what I understand.    
   (Janis, Jame, Ross, Sean: can you comment?)   
      
   I admit: I still miss my OS/2 setup but it was just getting too long in the   
   tooth and I needed more autonomy with the BBS running itself and running   
   headless to keep going that direction.   
      
   --Sean   
       
   --- MultiMail/Linux   
    * Origin: Outpost BBS * Limestone, TN, USA (1:18/200)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca