Hi Nick,   
      
   >> You can't fool me, Nick.  I know you want me to post a sig and break the   
   >> very rules of the echo.  (Just kidding :) :))   
      
   > Absolutely not. :)   
   > I merely wanted a description of what you were referring to.   
      
   Lol.. I knew that of course, I just couldn't resist the above line :) Call it   
   my sick sense of humor?    
      
   >> The kinds of SIGS Kim doesn't want in the echo are multiple-line   
   >> internet-style signatures.  Surely you know what I mean now?   
      
   > I do. Thanks for the elightenment on the matter. I guess I didn't really   
   > think there was any difference between the two -- except for the fact that   
   > the internet-style you refer to is much longer and convoluted, and can   
   > contain html chars and font changes and such.   
      
   Exactly.   
      
   >Short and sweet, is how it   
   > should always be, IMO.   
      
   Agree there.   
      
   Take care,   
   Janis   
      
   --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1   
    * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)