> But from Enric his reply it's not dangerous, but anyway i dont like it that   
   > way.   
      
    JK> The reason he says it is not dangerous is because you are in this   
    JK> case, only opening up those ports to receive, not to send.   
      
   that's a bad view... it allows any and all external sources to beat on any and   
   all of those ports to see if they can find a way in even if there is nothing   
   actually listening on those ports... the network stack still has to handle the   
   traffic if even only to drop it...   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12)