TID: PX/Win v7.0 PX98-1008M   
   MSGID: 1:342/200 b94cf45f   
   TZUTC: -0600   
   Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.e   
   ernal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.   
   lueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.u   
   enetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.hi   
   hwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail   
   From: "Digital Man"    
   Subject: A couple of questions   
   Message-ID: <66158E90.51569.sync@vert.synchro.net>   
   X-Comment-To: Nightfox   
   Organization: Vertrauen   
   Newsgroups: alt.bbs.synchronet   
   In-Reply-To: <661585D9.85660.dove_sync@digitaldistortionbbs.com>   
   References: <661585D9.85660.dove_sync@digitaldistortionbbs.com>   
   X-FTN-PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Win32 master/8108e0cd9 Apr 08 202 MSC 1916   
   X-FTN-MSGID: 51569.sync@1:103/705 2a7b8e01   
   X-FTN-REPLY: 51568.sync@1:103/705 2a7b8731   
   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437   
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit   
   X-Gateway: vert.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114]   
   Lines: 28   
   X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup   
   NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 18:53:07 UTC   
   Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:53:04 -0700   
   X-Received-Bytes: 2479   
   Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.bbs.synchronet:39194   
      
     To: Nightfox   
     Re: A couple of questions   
     By: Nightfox to Digital Man on Tue Apr 09 2024 11:15 am   
      
    >   Re: A couple of questions   
    >   By: Digital Man to Nightfox on Tue Apr 09 2024 10:53 am   
    >   
    >  DM> No, it is not your module's responsibility to update bbs.new_file_time.   
    >   
    > With ddfilelister set up as a loadable module, it seems bbs.new_file_time   
    > isn't being updated when I do a new file scan.  As a test, I tried setting   
    > my new file scan pointer back to January 1, 2024 (to make sure it was at an   
    > earlier time), and did a couple of new file scans in my current directory.   
    > ddfilelister prints bbs.new_file_time, and both times, it showed the January   
    > 1, 2024 date I had set and listed the same files.   
      
   That sounds like correct behavior to me. The new file date/time is set during   
   logon (by sbbs) only. The user normally has the option to adjust it (the &P   
   command in the default shell).   
      
   i.e. in Synchronet (like WWIV before it), if you perform successive "new file   
   scans" during the same "call" (logon), you'll see the same new files (unless   
   any new files were uploaded during the call, and then you'd see them too).    
   Synchronet has always worked this way:   
   https://synchro.net/docs/user.html#NewFileScan   
   --    
                                               digital man (rob)   
      
   This Is Spinal Tap quote #38:   
   Artie Fufkin:  I'm not asking, I'm telling with this. Kick my ass.   
   Norco, CA WX: 74.4øF, 17.0% humidity, 3 mph E wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs   
   --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114   
    *  Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net   
    * Origin: Joe's BBS (1:342/200)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/0 90/1 105/81 106/201 128/260 129/305 135/220 225 153/7715   
   SEEN-BY: 218/700 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 206 317 426 428 470   
   SEEN-BY: 229/550 664 700 266/512 282/1038 291/111 292/854 320/219   
   SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 201 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848 5075/35   
   PATH: 342/200 229/426