MSGID: 1:396/45.0 f9a218b0   
   REPLY: 1:153/757.2 5913aa99   
   CHRS: IBMPC 2   
   Hello Alan.   
      
      
      
   > I have had to change my netmail routing to another node that doesn't   
   > exhibit this aberrant behaviour.   
      
    AI> I haven't looked at the input .pkt so here is my guess.   
      
   > Any views on this?   
      
    AI> Was the packet addressed to 1:261/38? The packet header I mean. The   
    AI> messages within the packet could have been echomail or netmail   
    AI> addressed to any node and those message will be forwarded on as   
    AI> usual.   
      
   The mail bundle was addressed to 261/38 for forwarding purposes.  The packet   
   would have been addressed to 2:333/808.7. In yet another case the mail bundle   
   was again addressed to 1:261/38 and the packet would have been addressed to   
   2:221/360.  Those two were never delivered until I resent them to a different   
   node with international connections and a different tosser.  Those were   
   promptly delivered to their destinations by whatever group of intervening   
   nodes.   
      
   [snip]   
    AI> If that packet was addressed to 1:261/38 (the packet, not the   
    AI> messages inside) the tosser there will likely act on it as needed.   
      
   If by packet you actually mean the mail bundle, then yes the affected bundles   
   went to 1:261/38.   
      
   Best regards,   
   Marc   
      
   --- timEd/2 1.10.y2k+   
    * Origin: Sursum Corda! BBS-Huntsville,AL-bbs.sursum-corda.com (1:396/45)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 120/340 123/131 129/305 226/30 227/114 229/101   
   SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 550 664 1016 240/5832 249/206 317 292/854   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200   
   PATH: 396/45 280/464 229/101 426