> I have tried many BBS software packages since I got into BBSing in the late   
   > 80's. I have had a few BBS's that I did like. but that never kept me from   
   > looking at an evaluating and testing others.   
      
   This is basically what I do, but my main BBS is pretty much running the   
   software I want right now.  THis system is basically just Fido messages only.   
      
   > I started out with WC using a early version of DOS v2.0 on an XT machine. I   
   > myself never got into setting up too many doors. My focus seemed to me to be   
   > more toward messages and files. I got into Windows prior to Windows v3.0 but   
      
   Yeah, my main system at winserver.org runs a very modified Wildcat!   
   Interactive Net Server setup while this one here at r13.winserver.org runs   
   flat BBBS/NT.   
      
   > In trying differant BBS packages. I have noticed the wide variety of learning   
   > curves involved in the installation and setup. Some don't involve much more   
   > than   
   >clicking on or loading a install/setup program. While others require the SysOp   
   > to actually compile their own software from source code. Then there is the   
   > degree,   
   > quality, and comprehensiveness of the documentation.   
      
   I have to admit that Wildcat! 6 fails in the documentation department as new   
   orders for the product as some ship wihtou manuals and those that do, like   
   mine, ship with manuals for version 5.x.   
      
      
   >> Take care,   
   >> Janis   
      
   >> --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2   
   >> * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)   
      
   > Jeff   
      
   --- BBBS/NT v4.10 Dada-1   
    * Origin: Neptune's Lair ][ | Memphis TN | r13.winserver.org (1:261/20)