Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BAMA    |    Science Research Echo    |    1,586 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 735 of 1,586    |
|    Roger Nelson to All    |
|    Mystery in the Ozone Layer    |
|    05 Sep 14 15:09:31    |
      Mystery in the Ozone Layer               Sept. 5, 2014: High above Earth, more than 20 miles above sea level, a       diaphanous layer of ozone surrounds our planet, absorbing energetic UV rays       from the sun. It is, essentially, sunscreen for planet Earth. Without the       ozone layer, we would be bathed in dangerous radiation on a daily basis, with       side effects ranging from cataracts to cancer.               People were understandably alarmed, then, in the 1980s when scientists noticed       that manmade chemicals in the atmosphere were destroying this layer.       Governments quickly enacted an international treaty, called the Montreal       Protocol, to ban ozone-destroying gases such as CFCs then found in aerosol       cans and air conditioners. On September 16, 1987, the first 24 nations signed       the treaty; 173 more have signed on in the years since.               Fast forward 27 years. Ozone-depleting chemicals have declined and the ozone       hole appears to be on the mend. The United Nations has called the Montreal       Protocol "the most successful treaty in UN history." Yet, despite Montreal's       success, something is not . quite . right.               http://youtu.be/rq9EAHyHtu8               A new ScienceCast video looks into the surprising abundance of carbon       tetrachloride in the ozone layer. Where is it coming from?       A new study by NASA researchers shows that a key ozone-depleting compound       named carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) is surprisingly abundant in the ozone layer.               "We are not supposed to be seeing this at all," says NASA atmospheric       scientist Qing Liang.               Between 2007 and 2012, countries around the world reported zero emissions of       CCl4, yet measurements by satellites, weather balloons, aircraft, and       surface-based sensors tell a different story. A study led by Liang shows       worldwide emissions of CCl4 average 39 kilotons per year, approximately 30       percent of peak emissions prior to the international treaty going into effect.               In the 1980s, chlorofluorocarbons became well-known to the general public. As       the ozone hole widened, "CFC" became a household word. Fewer people, however,       have heard of CCl4, once used in applications such as dry cleaning and       fire-extinguishers.               "Nevertheless," says Liang, "CCl4 is a major ozone-depleting substance. It is       the 3rd most important anthropogenic ozone-depleting compound behind CFC-11       and CFC-12."               http://www.epa.gov/ozone/science/process.html        Click to learn about the chemistry of ozone depletion from the US       Environmental Protection Agency. Levels of CCl4 have been declining since the       Montreal Protocol was signed, just not as rapidly as expected. With zero       emissions, abundances should have dropped by 4% per year. Instead, the       decline has been closer to 1% per year.               To investigate the discrepancy, Liang and colleagues took CCl4 data gathered       by NOAA and NASA and plugged it into a NASA computer program, the 3-D GEOS       Chemistry Climate Model. This sophisticated program takes into account the       way CCl4 is broken apart by solar radiation in the stratosphere as well as how       the compound can be absorbed and degraded by contact with soil and ocean       waters. Model simulations pointed to an unidentified ongoing current source       of CCl4.               "It is now apparent there are either unidentified industrial leakages, large       emissions from contaminated sites, or unknown CCl4 sources," says Liang.               Another possibility is that the chemistry of CCl4 might not be fully       understood. Tellingly, the model showed that CCl4 is lingering in the       atmosphere 40% longer than previously thought. "Is there something about the       physical CCl4 loss process that we don't understand?" she wonders.               It all adds up to a mystery in the ozone layer.               Liang's research was published online in the Aug. 18th issue of Geophysical       Research Letters. More information about the extra CCl4 may be found there.               Credits:       Author: Dr. Tony Phillips | Production editor: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit:       Science@NASA                       Regards,               Roger              --- D'Bridge 3.99        * Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LoUiSiAna (1:3828/7)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca