Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BAMA    |    Science Research Echo    |    1,586 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 3 of 1,586    |
|    Roger Nelson to All    |
|        |
|    26 Aug 10 21:28:34    |
      Kepler Mission Manager Update               August 24, 2010               The Kepler team continues with its very busy operations and data analysis       activities. Monthly science data downloads were successfully completed in July       and August 2010 on schedule. These downloads represented Quarter 6, Months 1       and 2, of the Kepler mission data set. Project management and engineers       recently gathered to assess Kepler flight system performance since operations       began on May 12, 2009. Spacecraft subsystem engineers presented data summaries       and analyses on several functional areas: power, thermal, attitude       determination and control, telecommunications, avionics, propulsion and       photometer. These engineers were able to see how their systems performed over       a Kepler year (371 days), and even a bit of an overlap with the beginning of       year 2.               During the course of a Kepler Year, several changes occur. As the spacecraft       orbits the sun, while maintaining the telescope pointed at the science field       of view, the sun position changes on the solar panels, changing the solar       array output. As equipment moves in and out of the sun, heaters go on and off       to maintain stable temperatures. The star trackers, which are used for coarse       attitude control, use different stars each season. The relative angles to the       Earth also change throughout each quarter, causing the telecom signal levels       to change. All these things can change the spacecraft's performance. In       addition, with the year 2 overlap, we are able to see how performance has       changed since we were at the same conditions as we were one year ago.               In general, predictions were close to actual flight performance for all       systems. The power systems (solar panels and battery) have performed somewhat       better than expected. Thermal analysis shows the spacecraft is a bit warmer       than expected in some areas, probably due to some initial degradation of the       surfaces exposed to the sun, but well within expected ranges and all heaters       are working well. Since the flight software and star tracker patches that were       made in April 2010, the ADCS system has been nominal and the fine pointing       control used in science observations are well below the required accuracy and       stability requirements.               The telecom system has been performing without problems and is matching       predicted performance levels. Kepler is the first mission that uses Ka-Band to       downlink science data and we have been very pleased with both our spacecraft       performance and that of the Deep Space Network operations. We have been able       to communicate with the spacecraft at lower elevation angles than initially       planned, and the data drop-out rate has been very small. Avionics have been       working well, with good margins on processing capacity.               The propulsion system on Kepler is used about once every 3 days to spin down       the reaction wheels that are used to maintain attitude control. Analysis shows       that we are using slightly less propellant to do this than our conservative,       pre-launch models. The photometer continues to work well and although one       module failed back in January 2010, we still exceed the requirement for field       of view.               Predictions for the rest of the mission are all positive, and we see nothing       that would cause us to change our operating plans. The only expendable       resource we have on Kepler is propellant, and estimates are that we have       sufficient propellant for another 10 years (well above the 2.5 years remaining       in the nominal mission). Currently our most challenging issue as we look out       in the long term, is the telecom margin as the spacecraft gets further from       the Earth. We will have to continue to drop our data rate over time, as the       signal strength drops due to distance. Overall, the project is quite pleased       with the spacecraft's performance so far.               Meanwhile, the Kepler Science Team has been quite busy analyzing all the data       Kepler has collected to date. There are many planetary candidates that the       team must assess and verify as a true planet or a false signature. As you       know, the Kepler Mission has a primary goal of measuring the brightnesses of       100,000+ stars with unprecedented precision. If an Earth-sized planet orbits       in front of a sun-like star, the blocking of the starlight causes the star to       dim over and over, allowing Kepler to detect the planet. The bigger the       planet, the more light it blocks, allowing the Kepler team to determine the       diameter of the planet.               Such a discovery is called a "planet candidate" because it has not yet been       verified as a true planet. If it isn't a planet, why does the star appear to       dim, over and over? One nagging possibility is that behind the star are two       additional stars that orbit each other, eclipsing themselves when they cross       in front of each other. Such a background "eclipsing binary star" would dim       once per orbit, mimicking the dimming signature of a planet. In that case, the       "planet candidate" would not be a planet at all. We would be fooled. With       hundreds of planet candidates emerging from Kepler, as announced in June 2010,       the challenge of weeding out the eclipsing binary stars from the bona fide       planets is a daunting task.               The Kepler Mission assesses these false planets with its "Follow-up Observing       Program" (FOP) designed to distinguish true planets from the imposters. The       FOP consists of 15 team members, each with different expertise in different       methods of identifying pesky eclipsing binary stars. The first approach is to       obtain high quality pictures of the field of stars around the main stars. The       FOP takes images of the field surrounding Kepler stars using a 1-meter       telescope at Lick Observatory, 2-meter telescopes operated by the Las Cumbres       Observatory, and even the Keck telescope in Hawaii for the highest priority       stars. So far the FOP has obtained images of over 400 Kepler stars. To obtain       more detailed images, the FOP uses the adaptive optics system on the 5-meter       Palomar telescope and the MMT telescope on Mt. Hopkins. Adaptive optics can       take pictures capable of detecting any eclipsing binary located exceedingly       close to the star. Any star showing no eclipsing binary by adaptive optics is       unlikely to have one still hiding, by chance, behind the glare of the star.               Another way the FOP weeds out eclipsing binary star is by taking a       "reconnaissance" spectrum of the star. Using telescopes with 3-meter diameter       mirrors at Mt. Hopkins, McDonald, Lick and the Canary Islands observatories,       the light of a star can be spread out with a spectrometer into the colors       (i.e. wavelengths) of which the light is composed. Eclipsing binary stars       reveal themselves by the two distinct rainbows of colors they each produce,       painted one on top of the other, but displaced from each other by the Doppler       Effect. The Doppler effect is what allows a police officer to detect a       speeding car on the highway. An eclipsing binary star would exhibit two       different speed readings in its spectrum of colors, betraying the existence of       two orbiting stars whizzing around each other. The reconnaissance spectrum       also permits the FOP to determine how many "spectral lines" the star has and       how sharp those lines are. Spectral lines are light at a particular frequency,       just as a piano has notes of a particular frequency. The spectral lines come       from atoms in the star's atmosphere, and a large number of lines and their       sharpness offers a chance to measure the Doppler effect with extreme       precision, measuring the speed of the star to within human walking speed.       Indeed, the highest priority planet candidates (those nearly Earth-sized) are       then observed with the Keck telescope in Hawaii with its "HIRES" spectrometer,       with the goal of measuring the Doppler Effect with extreme precision of one       meter per second. A planet will pull gravitationally on its host star, yanking       it to and fro, and such motion of the star can be detected by the changing       Doppler effect. Thus, the planet candidate can be certified as a bona fide       planet by detecting the orderly "wobble" of the star as seen in the       continuously oscillating Doppler effect.               Moreover, the Kepler FOP measures the amount of Doppler effect of the star.       The more massive the planet, and greater the gravitational tug on the host       star. So the FOP can use the amount of Doppler effect of the star to measure       the mass of the planet. This is a glorious achievement, as the dimming       measured by Kepler gives us the planet's diameter, while the Doppler effect       gives us the planet's mass. The beauty of this is that we can directly       determine the density of the planet, which is its mass divided by its volume.       Planets like Earth have the high density of rock, about 5 grams per cubic       centimeter, while gaseous planets like Jupiter have much lower densities of       about 1 gram per cubic centimeter. The FOP measurement of the planet's density       allows the Kepler team to distinguish true rocky planets, like Earth, from       gaseous planets, like Jupiter.               The FOP has its work cut out for it. With hundreds of candidate planets from       Kepler, there are thousands of imaging and spectroscopic observations that       must be made. The FOP scientists are incredibly hard-working, spending       hundreds of long nights at telescopes around the world. The two goals of the       FOP are crucial to the Kepler mission, namely to weed out the eclipsing binary       stars that mimic planets and to measure the masses of the credentialed       planets. So far, many hundreds of images and over 700 spectra have already       been taken of the Kepler planet candidates. A dozen eclipsing binaries have       indeed been found, cleansing them from the planet candidates that Kepler       continues to pursue. In the end, Kepler plus the FOP will provide the hard       data that secure the discovery of Earth-sized planets around other stars.                       Regards,               Roger              --- D'Bridge 3.54        * Origin: NCS BBS (1:3828/7)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca