Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BAMA    |    Science Research Echo    |    1,586 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 221 of 1,586    |
|    Roger Nelson to All    |
|    Oh-My-God Particle    |
|    17 Dec 11 12:26:18    |
      Hello All!              I haven't posted this in quite awhile, but thought now would be a good time,       considering what scientists are doing with the super-collider.              ---------------------------------------------------------------------------              The Oh-My-God Particle, by John Walker, January 4, 1994              Fly's Eye              The University of Utah operates a cosmic ray detector called the Fly's Eye       II, situated at the Dugway Proving Ground about an hour's drive from Salt       Lake City. The Fly's Eye consists of an array of telescopes which stare       into the night sky and record the blue flashes which result when very high       energy cosmic rays slam into the atmosphere. From the height and intensity       of the flash, one can calculate the nature of the particle and its energy.              On the night of October 15, 1991, the Fly's Eye detected a proton with an       energy of 3.20.9x10^20 electron volts.[1,2] By comparison, the recently-       canceled Superconducting Super Collider (SSC) would have accelerated protons       to an energy of 20 TeV, or 2x10^13 electron volts -- ten million times less.       The energy of the Oh My God particle seen by the Fly's Eye is equivalent to       51 joules -- enough to light a 40 watt light bulb for more than a second --       equivalent, in the words of Utah physicist Pierre Sokolsky, to "a brick       falling on your toe." The particle's energy is equivalent to an American       baseball travelling fifty-five miles an hour.              All evidence points to these extremely high energy particles being protons       -- the nuclei of hydrogen atoms. Recalling that the rest mass of the proton       is 938.28 MeV -- roughly 1 GeV, 1x10^9 eV, all of the rest of the particle's       energy results from the kinetic energy resulting from its motion, which we       can calculate according to basic formulae of special relativity. So let's       crunch a few numbers.              Microbial Mass              First of all, noting that mass and energy are equivalent, we can calculate       the rest mass equivalent of a 3x10^20 eV particle to be about 5x10^-13 grams.       That doesn't sound like much until you recall that this is about 3x10^11       daltons (chemists measure molecular mass in daltons, where 1 dalton is the       mass of a hydrogen atom), just about the same as a single cell of the       intestinal bacterium E. coli (5x10^11 daltons). Thus this single subatomic       particle had a mass-energy equivalent to a bacterium.              How Fast?              How fast was it going? Pretty fast. The total mass-energy of a particle is       given in special relativity by the equation:               . M_0        . M = ------------ [1]        . v        . Sqrt[1 - --]        . c              where M_0 is the particle's rest mass, 0, v is the particle's velocity, and       c is the speed of light. Okay, we know that the Oh My God proton has a rest       mass of about 1 GeV, and a total kinetic energy of 3x10^20 eV, so let's solve       equation [1] for v, setting c to 1 to obtain velocity as a fraction of the       speed of light:               v = Sqrt[m - M_0] / m               And thus, approximately:               v = 0.9999999999999999999999951 c              So taking 3x10^8 metres per second as the speed of light, we find that the       particle was traveling 2.9999999999999999999999853x10^8 metres per second,       thus 1.467x10^-15 metres per second slower than light -- one and a half       femtometres per second slower than light. If God's radar gun is slightly       out of calibration, this puppy's gonna be doin' hard time for speeding.       After traveling one light year, the particle would be only 0.15 femtoseconds       -- 46 nanometres -- behind a photon that left at the same time.              Quicktime              Recall also that time passes more slowly in a moving reference frame, by the       factor:               . t0        . t = ------------        . v        . Sqrt[1 - --]        . c              Since we know v/c, we can immediately calculate:               . t        . -- = 3.197x10^11        . t0              and thus, moving in the reference frame of the particle, time passes three       hundred billion times slower than in a rest frame. Thus, given that the       particle travels with essentially the speed of light, an observer traveling       along with the particle would perceive the flight time from the following       objects to the Earth.               Distance[3] Perceived        Object (light years) Travel Time        =============== ================== ===========        Alpha Centauri 4.36 0.43 milliseconds        Galactic nucleus 32,000 3.2 seconds        Andromeda galaxy 2,180,000 3.5 minutes        Virgo cluster 42,000,000 1.15 hours        Quasar 3C273 2,500,000,000 3 days        Edge of universe 17,000,000,000 19 days              Thus, if you could accelerate yourself to the speed at which the Oh My God       particle was traveling, you'd be able to travel to the edge of the visible       universe in a couple of weeks. Unfortunately, even assuming you found a       source for the energy it would take and invented a means to accelerate       yourself and Intergalactic Vessel Omega Point to this velocity, you wouldn't       get far before being disrupted into subatomic goo due to interactions with       photons in the ubiquitous cosmic microwave background radiation. Sokolsky       has calculated that at 3x10^20 eV, even a single proton could travel no       farther than 10 megaparsecs, about the distance of the Virgo galaxy cluster,       before losing energy in this manner.              Warp Factor Oh-My-God -- Engage!              It is interesting to observe that a real particle, in our universe, subject       to all the laws of physics we understand, is a rather better interstellar       voyager than the best fielded in the 24th century by the United Federation       of Planets. Their much-vaunted Galaxy Class starships are capable of speeds       slightly in excess of Warp Factor 9, an apparent velocity of 1516 cochranes       (or 1516 times the speed of light).[4] At a velocity of 1516 c, traveling       to the centre of the galaxy would take, as perceived by the life forms on       board, a little more than 21 years. By contrast, an observer on board the       Oh-My-God particle would arrive at the nucleus of the Milky Way, according       to his clock, just about 3 seconds after leaving Starbase Terra. That's more       than 9,700,000 times faster than the starship. In the time the starship       spends vacuum-whooshing and rumbling its way to the nearby star Aldebaran,       the particle could travel to the edge of the visible universe.              Go Fast -- Grow Thin              Finally, let's consider the length contraction in the direction of motion       which results from the Lorentz transformation -- objects in the direction       of travel are seen to contract in that direction by a factor of:               . l v        . -- = Sqrt[1 - --]        . l0 c              And thus, paralleling the time dilation calculated above, in the frame of       the particle, oncoming objects are seen as contracted by a factor of       3x10^11, three hundred billion times, in thickness. Thus, seen from the       particle, the objects below will have the following thickness.               Object Rest Frame Thickness Particle Frame Thickness        ================ ==================== ===========================               Earth's diameter 12,756 km 0.0399mm               Solar system 80 AU 37 metres               Sun/Alpha Centauri 4.3 light years 127 km (79 mi)               30 kiloparsecs 2,895,000 km Milky Way galaxy        . about ten times the        . distance from the        . Earth to the Moon              But How?              How was such an extraordinary particle created? What cosmic process       accelerated a mundane proton to a brick-on-the-toe-energy?              Nobody knows. A particle with such energy would be deflected little by       galactic magnetic fields, and so its impact track should point right       back at the source.              Astronomers see nothing unusual in that direction.              Nature remains rich in mysteries.              References               [1]Physical Review Letters, 22 November 1993.               [2]G. Taubes, Science 262, 1649 (1993).               [3]Ottewell, G. The Astronomical Companion. Greenville SC: Astronomical        Workshop, 1979-1992. ISBN 0-93456-01-0.               [4]Sternbach, R. and M. Okuda. Star Trek: The Next Generation Technical        Manual.        New York: Pocket Books, 1991. ISBN 0-671-70427-3.              Disclaimer              These calculations involve some elementary but easy to mess up algebra and       some very demanding numerical calculations for which regular IEEE double       precision is insufficient. If you'd like to double-check these results, be       sure to use a multiple precision calculator with at least 30 significant       digits of accuracy. I generally use Mathematica for symbolic work and Mark       Hopkins' package C-BC for number crunching. It's entirely possible I've       made one or more mistakes of order-of-magnitude or greater significance.       But even so, (and please correct me!), this is, particle physics wise, a       genuine Oh Wow event.               by John Walker                     Regards,              Roger        --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+        * Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LA - (1:3828/7)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca