On Wed Oct-26-2016 11:53, mark lewis (1:3634/12.73) wrote to Roger Nelson:   
      
    ml> 26 Oct 16 06:53, you wrote to Paul Quinn:   
      
   [...]   
      
    ml> does your tosser toss them into your badmessages or dupes area OR   
    ml> does it toss them into the echo they are supposed to be in?   
      
   Both, depending on the path.   
      
    ml> if your tosser tosses them into your badmessages or dupes area,   
    ml> then it has caught them as a duplicate... otherwise, it has missed   
    ml> that they are a dupe (unless your tosser has a setting to keep them   
    ml> in the original echo)...    
      
   Bad_Msgs area.   
      
    ml> in most cases, the system ""above"" you that sends the dupes to you   
    ml> should catch them... it may not be able to do so if its dupe   
    ml> database gets flushed of dupe data real quickly because of the   
    ml> amount of traffic it handles... that's if that system even has dupe   
    ml> detection enabled... they may not have it enabled if they elect to   
    ml> send all mail on to their connections and let them determine if it   
    ml> is a dupe or not... they may decide to do that so as to avoid false   
    ml> positives being stopped and not propogating...   
      
   But that system's dupe detector worked well for years and years until lately.   
   No, I believe the problem lies in a misconfiguration somewhere eles.   
      
      
   Regards,   
      
   Roger    
   --- timEd/386 1.10.y2k+ W10 (1607)   
    * Origin: NCS BBS - Houma, LoUiSiAna - (1:3828/7)