Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    BAMA    |    Science Research Echo    |    1,586 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,137 of 1,586    |
|    Paul Quinn to Roger Nelson    |
|    Almost missed observation    |
|    24 Jun 16 17:14:26    |
      Hi! Roger,              On 06/23/2016 10:01 AM, you wrote:               PQ>> NASA wants to do a return mission, using the 'battlestar galactica'        PQ>> methodology. Which requires a humoungous effort & budget.               RN> What do they propose powering it with?              The naming is referencing the scale of operations. Both the Mare One ships       and NASA's will use standard chemical rockets.              Mars One wanted originally to use existing (or upgraded) Apollo-type       hardware. They couldn't get their stuff together, financially-speaking.              Otherwise they had a viable plan using cheap existing hardware, and a       timetable of roughly 2013-2015/2016 for their first missions. Yep, their       first unmanned ship should have landed one or two years ago, and ought to have       been manufacturing oxygen, water & fuel for the return mission this last       year. BTW, 2016 sees Mars at its closest to Earth for the last decade.              Mars One is based on a proposal for an original Mars Direct mission. Check out       any EwwToob vids about Robert Zubrin (The Case For Mars or anything that       mentions "Mars direct", or maybe "Mars Underground"). (Totally unrelated but       if you get a chance, check out his "Transorbital Railroad" video. It's a       blast!)              Conversely, NASA wants to take everything (food, oxygen, water & fuel). Also,       the crew number is essentially doubled. Plus they plan a lot of EVA around       another purpose-built station in LEO, to build their 'mother ship'. Once in       orbit around Mars there will be a lot of EVA and shuttle/rendezvous events       getting to & from the surface, with a reduced time on planet schedule       (compared with Mars Direct). Meanwhile NASA's timetable is... "oh, maybe       after 2025 we might get something going".              I haven't checked recently, but Mars One is already in the early stages of       garnering industry to provide hardware, while their first batch of cosmonaut       crews are in-training. All the basics have been worked out with a lot of R&D       (on how to produce fuel, water & air, and, living & working in the various       crew cabins & vehicles) having been done by the Mars Direct/Mars Society brain       trust. Since it's a private operation, they need more financing. Their plan       is to have a colony established on Mars _by_ 2026-ish.              Cheers,       Paul.              --- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0        * Origin: Quinn's Rock vBox - sunny side up on the bookcase (3:640/1384)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca