Joseph DeMartino wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2:49 pm, Elko T wrote:
>> Joseph DeMartino wrote:
>
>>> And you've clearly never seen "When Harry Met Sally".
>> Funny you should mention that one. It is one of the most
>> over-the-top fake orgasms I've seen. Are you seriously saying that it
>> looks genuine to you? But I always enjoyed it, being in a comedy and it
>> was supposed to be obviously fake.
>
> No, I'm not saying it looks genuine to me. I'm saying that the whole
> point of the *joke* is that women - in real life - can and do
> successfully fake orgasms. And if you don't believe me, ask one of
> your *ex* girlfriends. Or are you going to tell me that you're the
> only heterosexual male in the history of the world who has never been
> fooled by a fake orgasm? (How would you *know*? That you think they
> were all real doesn't prove they were, it just proves that women can
> fake them. )
Heh. They can try and fake them all they want, they're not fooling
me. To be fair, I don't think I've had a partner that had any
reason to fake them, so maybe I could have been fooled by one the first
5 times, until I learned to read her. After that - no way; one has to be
a piece of wood in order to not feel how the reaction ebbs and flows. :)
In any event, my experiences are quite orthogonal - instead of faking
it, if not achieved, the usual outcome is a request for continuation,
until it is.
The only possible errors are false negatives. Some women have almost
nonexistent external manifestation of their orgasms (same as with some
men, but there's that tell-tale ejaculation). With them, it is
impossible to tell, and when they try to act it out, it looks fake, even
though it isn't.
--
No, no, you can't e-mail me with the nono.
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400)
|
