On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:42:19 -0800, Charlie E.    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:36:23 -0600, cmadams@hiwaay.net (Chris Adams)   
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>Once upon a time, Blair Leatherwood   said:   
   >>>Was anyone else disappointed that there was no mention whatsoever of The    
   >>>Outer Limits?   
      
   >>Yes.  It seemed very Trek-heavy to me.   
      
   >It was mentioned, something about stations blacking out certain scenes   
   >because they were too intense, but they really just focused on the   
   >three 'seminal' series - Trek, Lost in Space and Twilight Zone.  Bill   
   >got a lot of air time, though, as a veteran of two of those series.   
      
   How in the WORLD did "Lost in Space" show up as a "Pioneer of   
   Television?"  It was the cheesiest SF show I've ever seen.  Trek was   
   probably the biggest contributor in this area, and the Zone was also a   
   big mover in pusing the boundaries, but B5 certainly rates a mention   
   well ahead of Lost in Space deserving one.     
      
   Stargate SG-1 should also have appeared on the list -- after all, they   
   went for TEN SEASONS (something no other SF show has EVER done) plus   
   two direct-to-DVD feature films, and SG1 fans are STILL asking for   
   more.  Even Trek TNG only went for something like seven seasons plus,   
   what, four movies?   
      
   -- //Steve//   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32   
    * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400)