On Dec 21, 9:38 am, Jan wrote:
> In article <79f6fd28-7be4-457b-b92c-245460b11...@u25g2000pra.g
oglegroups.com>,
> Duggy says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Dec 20, 10:38=A0pm, Vince M Hudd wrote:
> >> Joseph DeMartino wrote:
> >> > Yeah, I'm pretty sure that similar circumstances well eventually FORCE =
> >me
> >> > to use Facebook. =A0But I won't like it and I insist on my right to be
> >> > dragged kicking and screaming into the future.
>
> >> I felt that way about social networking sites in general at one point, bu=
> >t
> >> then I caved and joined Facebook. It's not so bad as long as you can
> >> mentally filter out the sheer idiocy you'll see from day to day in some
> >> friends' status updates, not to mention being bombarded with "invitations=
> >"
> >> to use this, that or the other lamoid app on the site from the same frien=
> >ds.
>
> >> And the latest example of totally brain dead 'innovation' on the site is =
> >the
> >> new format 'groups' - whereby friends can 'add' you to a group. Yes, *add=
> >*
> >> you. Not *invite* you, which you could decline (or just ignore), but
> >> actually *add* you, so that if you don't want to be a member of their lat=
> >est
> >> daft group, having been added you have to go to the effort of removing
> >> yourself. (Once removed, you can't then be added - but that does miss the
> >> point somewhat!)
>
> >> Why am I still on Facebook, again? I seem to have forgotten. :|
>
> >I created a group called "Facebook groups should be opt in not opt
> >out" over that issue.
>
> >Within a couple of days of that change, Mark Zuckerberg was added to a
> >NAMBLA group.
>
> Then apparently he 'friended' the wrong person. ONLY friends can add you to
> groups and the person gets a notification. Yeah, it's a stupid situation but
> the members do have a fair amount of control.
The "friend" was an technology critic who was added to it, and added
Mark to prove a point.
===
= DUG.
===
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32
* Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400)
|
