On Nov 4, 9:41 am, j...@xmission.com wrote:   
   > The way it should work is not with a write-in. It should be the last   
   > choice on the actual ballot for every office. If "none of the above"   
   > wins, there is a special election in mid December for that office.   
   > Those that were on the original ballot are not eligible to run on the   
   > second, and write-ins for them are not counted.   
   > No more would we be forced into a choice between an idiot incumbent and   
   > a brain-dead challenger.   
   And would the expensive second election bring any better candidates or   
   a lot of single-issue independents?   
   And what would the idiot incumbent - now the caretaker lame duck   
   incombent do in the mean time?   
   ===   
   = DUG.   
   ===   
   --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32   
    * Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400)