Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    AVIATION    |    Aviation echo, airline-related news    |    717 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 464 of 717    |
|    Aviation HQ to All    |
|    Ural Air A320 in a corn field    |
|    01 Dec 23 01:09:40    |
      MSGID: 2:292/854 07142948       TZUTC: 0200       The 159 passengers of Ural Airlines flight 1383, which landed in a Russian       cornfield in September, will receive a thousand euros in compensation per       person. This is much less than they are entitled to. Some reports mention       pilot error as the cause of the ditch. The aircraft is still out in the field.               The 159 passengers, who all got off the A320 unscathed, received 100,000       rubles, which is a thousand euros. International treaties on compensation for       civil aviation accidents contain much higher amounts. Ural Airlines, based in       Yekaterinburg, says it is nevertheless adhering to the rules.               There were 159 passengers and six crew members on board the Ural Airlines A320       on September 12. The plane was en route from Sochi to Omsk when the pilots       reported hydraulic problems just before landing and made a go-around. They       wanted to divert to Novosibirsk airport because of the longer runway. However,       the additional distance was 600 kilometers.               Partly because the landing gear doors could no longer close and there was a       strong headwind, the aircraft consumed a lot of fuel and they could not reach       Novosibirsk. The captain chose to land the Airbus in a wheat field near the       village of Kamenka. The crew carried out the emergency landing very       successfully: none of the occupants suffered any significant injuries. The       passengers and crew were later evacuated by land.               Who is to blame?               The Russian authorities have now looked into the situation, but their       conclusions are not clear. In some reports, the pilots - both of whom have       been suspended - are blamed: they should have landed in Omsk, because the       captain should have known that he did not have enough fuel to reach       Novosibirsk in the first place.               Other researchers defend the crew. A theory that is also doing the rounds in       Russian aviation circles is that Ural Airlines has used inferior parts for       repairs due to the Western boycott. The airline has denied this.               In the meantime, the A320 is still in the cornfield. The aircraft has not       suffered any major damage and could technically fly again, but Ural Airlines       does not yet know how the aircraft can be removed. Taking off and using the       field as a runway is one option, albeit a risky one. Other solutions are not       yet available.               And the harsh winter is approaching in the area, with lots of snow and       extremely low temperatures. The company now appears to have chosen to pack the       aircraft and look for new options for salvaging the Airbus in the spring of       2024.              --- DB4 - 20230201        * Origin: AVIATION ECHO HQ (2:292/854)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 15/0 80/1 90/1 105/81 106/201 123/131 129/305 153/7715       SEEN-BY: 221/1 226/30 227/114 229/110 112 113 307 317 400 426 428       SEEN-BY: 229/470 664 700 280/464 282/1038 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1       SEEN-BY: 320/219 322/757 335/364 342/200 396/45 460/58 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 5075/35       PATH: 292/854 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca