ML>ML>ML>nah... i prefer the old school methods... they're a lot cheaper   
   ML>ML>ML>and do no expose one to being ripped off ;)   
      
   ML>ML> TW> ????? Ripped, off HOW??   
   ML>ML> TW> The Oil Analysis Lab have nothign to gain by lying to you   
   ML>ML> TW> about the   
   ML>ML> TW> Analysis.   
      
   ML>ML>i didn't say that the analysis labs would be ripping you off ;)   
      
   ML> TW> ????   
      
   ML>i said that i prefer to use the old school methods for cost and   
   ML>non-exposure   
   ML>being ripped off... how can i be exposed to being ripped off if i'm   
   ML>doing th   
   ML>testing myself and not allowing someone else to try to sell me snake oil?   
      
   ML>understand now? ;)   
      
    TW> I understand avoiding the cost but Just how you think that the Oil   
    TW> Analysis Lab would rip you off. Do you think they will LIE to you   
    TW> about your Oil Sample?   
      
   i (still) haven't said anything about the oil labs would rip me off.. however,   
   if they were being paid by the vehicle manufacturers and this testing was   
   "free" for their vehicles, then yes, they could very easily being attempting   
   to "rip me off"... in this particular instance, they would be in the position   
   to do such... even moreso if the manufacturer gets a (hidden) kickback from   
   them...   
      
   but you still did not ack understanding my original (and still quoted above)   
   premise ;)   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12)