TID: FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
   RFC-X-No-Archive: Yes   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   CHRS: UTF-8 2   
   PID: GED+LNX 1.1.5-b20161221   
   MSGID: 2:280/464 60784b01   
   REPLY: 2:221/1.58@fidonet ef718475   
   Hi August,   
      
   On 2021-04-15 09:31:00, you wrote to me:   
      
    AA>>> ;)  However, "may" is very clear.  :D   
      
    WvV>> I beg to differ...   
      
    AA> According to fta-1006, the definitions are clear. But   
    AA> interestingly, the doc expired 20 years ago.  Why a definition   
    AA> doc needs to expire (and not be replaced by something else)   
    AA> alludes me.   
      
   I think I red somewhere that every ftsc document needs to be reviewed every 2   
   years... Maurice should know, he's a member! ;)   
      
    AA>>> They're all just a bunch of 1's and 0's in the end.  It's   
    AA>>> all the same stuff.  :D   
      
    WvV>> But how we get there isn't...   
      
    AA> Oh.. that's true enough.  But I've made my point. Assuming that   
    AA> the serialno must be implemenet in hex is just that, an   
    AA> assumption.   
      
   Well if most software expects a hex number, maybe the standard needs to be   
   reviewed, and worded more strict. ;)   
      
   Bye, Wilfred.   
      
   --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815   
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 120/340 123/131 124/5016 129/305   
   SEEN-BY: 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 452 664   
   SEEN-BY: 229/700 1016 1017 240/5832 249/110 206 317 400 280/464 5003   
   SEEN-BY: 282/1038 288/100 292/8125 301/1 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/120 460/58 633/280 770/1   
   PATH: 280/464 229/101 426