Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ASIAN_LINK    |    Not the kind that loves you long time    |    8,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 7,732 of 8,456    |
|    Charles Pierson to August Abolins    |
|    only check/reply to messages every 2 mon    |
|    01 Jan 21 18:19:42    |
      TID: Mystic BBS 1.12 A46       MSGID: 1:106/127 fb86f7ab       TZUTC: 0000       On 01 Jan 2021, August Abolins said the following...        AA> Often, when I revisit the older-than-2month "tagged for replies"         AA> messages, I can't remember Wtf I had in mind as a reply. :/         AA> Sometimes it comes back to me in a few seconds, so then I may         AA> decide to keep them on the back-burner a little while longer.        AA>         AA> Sometimes I later realize that someone else may have delt with         AA> the topic.        AA>         AA> This is part of the reason I think sysops should never let an         AA> echo to completely purge of all (old) messages. Instead, try to         AA> keep at least a modicum selection of say "the last 200" or so.        AA>               I believe my point softwares that I used kept 300 messages per echo.              My BBS here holds 500 per echo. If I am able to get a new phone this year,       and let this one be strictly BBS related, I'll probably expand on that. I'm       currently carrying around 200 message areas I believe, and unfortunately,       this phone doesn't let applications run off of the SD card, so it limits my       available space.               AA> CS> BTW, saw some silly dust ups about the telegram bit. Best        AA> CS> to tell them it's from our standpoint much like a fancy OLR        AA> CS> that works well in a world of tablets and such technology..        AA>         AA> Thank you for that. I'd like to forward your full comment to the         AA> FIDONET.TELEGRAM echo. It may serve to educate new sysops/users.              I think a big part of the dust up was a lack of communication. wh8ch is       somewhat humourous considering this is a communucation medium.               AA> CS> Technically when Dale Shipp was feeding me traffic on the        AA> CS> USS McHenry then USS Essex, we dove off to an email to email        AA> CS> delivery with OLR on each end. Similar in concept.        AA>         AA> OMG.. "our" data was being transmitted to various USS ships         AA> without our prior knowledge! What about privacy, what about our         AA> rights! What unsavoury servers are utilized on those ships? Or..         AA> even what over-the-air non-FTN techonolgy was used for         AA> transmissions? The horror.        AA>         AA> I know one sysop who implemented a mechanism to forward netmail         AA> to his user's cell phones in the early 2000's. Surely, a lot of         AA> "unkown" servers and systems would be involved in-between. Noone         AA> seemed to be bothered by that.        AA>               In the early to mid 90's, at least one echo I was active in used a       gateway program and Juno email to connect to email lists. There wsn't any       issue that I was aware of.              But there has always been complaints about changes to how and where Fidonet       traffic is.               "Privacy" concerns just seem to loom larger these days than in the past.               AA> Too late. Less than just 2 weeks of implementation, a couple of         AA> modertors changed their minds (they approved the transmissions         AA> previously) about this alternate OLR after only a couple other         AA> people raised questions.        AA>         AA> The experiment lost WIFI, X-FILES, NZ_FIDONET, WHAT'S_HOT! &         AA> RETAIL_HORROR ..all good candidates for the independent chat         AA> style of messaging.        AA>         AA> Maybe you can help dispell any fears?              Again, I still say it was a communication problem. I remember Carol       mentioning at least that the link was coming. That's more than those echos       you mention above did.              Like I was trying to say before during that hooplah, going forward, even       after getting moderators permission, take a little time explaining how it       works in the echo before going live.              Yes, there are going to be some users and even sysops opposed to the idea,       but they are free to no longer participate in the echo if it bothers them       that much.              --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)        * Origin: theoasisbbs.ddns.net:1357 (1:106/127)       SEEN-BY: 1/123 18/200 90/1 105/81 106/127 120/340 123/131 124/5016       SEEN-BY: 153/757 154/10 203/0 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/101       SEEN-BY: 229/424 426 452 664 1016 1017 230/0 240/5832 249/110 206       SEEN-BY: 249/317 400 280/464 5003 288/100 292/8125 310/31 317/3 322/757       SEEN-BY: 335/364 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 633/280 770/1 4500/1       PATH: 106/127 221/6 1 280/464 229/101 426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca