Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ASIAN_LINK    |    Not the kind that loves you long time    |    8,456 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 6,429 of 8,456    |
|    Maurice Kinal to Ozz Nixon    |
|    Re TZUTC    |
|    13 Mar 19 17:34:54    |
      MSGID: 2:280/464.113 5c893f3e       REPLY: 1:275/362.0 5c893198       Hey Ozz!               ON> you point to the statement in general that 3.4.2 was revised in        ON> 2004 to state "must"              Which only applied to UTC. Before 2004 it could also be a - character as in       -0000 or -00, whereas after 2004 it became "must" be a + character which means       +0000 or +00 and NEVER -0000 or -00. All other timezones were either + or -       depending whether they were ahead (+) or behind (-) UTC.              I am still waiting a reference where it states that dropping the + character       is acceptable behavior as you state in "MSGID: 1:275/362.0 5c88111e" and I       quote;               See we can not say that, as the ISO standard also had "+" as        optional, until it was revised in 2004. Both our FTSC standard        and the ISO standard were the same.              Please produce the evidence for the above or acknowledge it as bullshit which       it now appears to be, especially in light of the quote offered in "MSGID:       2:280/464.113 5c881a3a" which was quoted from ISO 8601. You provide nothing       in return to back up your above quoted statement. I sincerely doubt it's       validity.               ON> Material in question, is FTSC not RFC, nor ISO, but F.T.S.C.              Agreed. I have never disputed that fact. What I am stating, and have stated       in the past, is that fts-4008.002 in particular is a highly faulty document       that should have never seen the light of day and it's author should hang his       head in shame. Also I recall stating that the concept of UTC offsets was       pirated and corrupted or something along that line and have provided evidence       to back my statement.              Life is good,       Maurice              ... Don't cry for me I have vi.       --- GNU bash, version 5.0.2(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)        * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint - Ladysmith BC, Canada (2:280/464.113)       SEEN-BY: 15/2 18/200 57/0 123/1970 153/250 226/17 229/107 426 452       SEEN-BY: 229/1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 267/800 280/464 317/2 3       SEEN-BY: 322/757 342/200 393/68 633/0 267 280 281 408 412 640/1384       SEEN-BY: 712/620 848 886 770/0 1 10 100 330 340 772/0 1 210 500       PATH: 280/464 770/1 712/848 633/280 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca