home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ASIAN_LINK      Not the kind that loves you long time      8,456 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 6,424 of 8,456   
   Maurice Kinal to Ozz Nixon   
   Re TZUTC   
   11 Mar 19 20:43:39   
   
   MSGID: 2:280/464.113 5c86c87b   
   REPLY: 1:275/362.0 5c86a252   
   Hey Ozz!   
      
    ON> Coming soon...   
      
   :::shudder:::   
      
   Why bother?  If there is not a current and/or past application then what is   
   the purpose of creating one that obviously is flawed and will introduce bugs   
   given the corrupt offsets for at least half of the offsets listed in   
   fts-4008.002?  Wouldn't it be more prudent to correct that documentation and   
   use strftime's supported %z that honours the original intent of offsets in the   
   first place?  It seems to me that this is the PERFECT opportunity to right a   
   past wrong.   
      
    ON> In the Pascal world we have FormatDatetime   
      
   I noticed that when doing a search the other day.  Not bad but strftime() is   
   better methinks.   
      
    ON> In Python we have datetime.datetime.now().strftime("%d %b %y  %T")   
      
   Also perl, php, c, c++, ruby, etc.  Has been for ages.  Too bad pascal cannot   
   keep up with the (strf)times eh?  ;-)   
      
    ON> Thanks to you showing me %T   
      
   See http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/strftime.3.html for all the   
   specifiers.  They should be the same for all languages/interpreters/scripter.    
   The coreutils date runtime also includes a few switches for compatibilty with   
   certain formats such as --iso-8601 which is not in strftime() but can easily   
   be reproduced with the correct specifiers.  Piece of cake ... including the   
   obsolete FTN datetime stamp.  ;-)   
      
   However %z will ALWAYS output the + character where applicable such as in UTC   
   based systems;   
      
     date +%z = +0000   
      
   You will have to add a routine to strip it which will break other apps that   
   follow the real world standards for utc offsets.  Whoever wrote fts-4008.002   
   should hang their head in shame.  :::sigh:::   
      
   Life is good,   
   Maurice   
      
   ... Don't cry for me I have vi.   
   --- GNU bash, version 5.0.2(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)   
    * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint - Ladysmith BC, Canada (2:280/464.113)   
   SEEN-BY: 15/2 18/200 123/1970 154/10 203/0 221/0 226/17 229/107 426   
   SEEN-BY: 229/452 1014 240/5832 249/206 317 400 280/464 5003 310/31   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 322/757 342/200 393/68 396/45 423/120 633/280 770/1   
   PATH: 280/464 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca