Re: jumpin' jack flash   
     By: Little Mikey to Alan Ianson on Mon Apr 23 2018 02:49 am   
      
    LM> Now this is REALLY confusing as the first two tests just got resent, and   
    LM> if you are replying to the original test, then if the uplink cannot handle   
    LM> a regular fts-0001.016 compliant pktheader it should show up later without   
    LM> the first test (the one you just replied to) as it will be a dupe in that   
    LM> pkt. Hopefully that will tell the tale and eleviate the confusion.   
      
   I only see the one message here so if there were more than one transmissions I   
   can only tell you that I replied to the one I received!   
      
   The one I replied to has a path of 153/7001 7715, and the message I am replying   
   to now has a path of 153/7001 154/10 (and a few others).   
      
    LM> Also I sent out a third test that if it doesn't show up here should   
    LM> confirm that the uplink in question indeed cnnot process fts-0001.016   
    LM> compliant pktHeaders ... or whatever the kids are calling them these days.   
      
    LM> For the record this reply is being sent to an uplink that CAN handle    
    LM> fts-0001.016 compliant pktHeaders as this reply should confirm.   
      
   Confirmed. sbbsecho logs pkt files received from 153/7715 as being type 2+. Is   
   that different than fts-0001.016?   
      
    Ttyl :-),   
            Al   
      
      
   ... It's not the money I want, it's the stuff.   
   --- SBBSecho 3.04-Linux   
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC trmb.synchro.net (1:153/757)