Attention mark,   
      
   A netmail was sent to the uplink 1:153/7715 and it was accepted by that node.    
   So far no reply.   
      
   Also posted to ASIAN_LINK and sent via 1:153/7715 two fts-0001.016 compliant   
   packed messages - one with a so-called Type 2+ header, the second with an   
   fts-0001.016 compliant pktheader - in seperate pkts of course.  Both were   
   accepted but their status beyond that is unknown.   
      
   The first (MSGID: 1:153/7001 5ada6628) is posted to "Doctor Flexy Jerkoff"   
   with the subject "jumpin' jack flash".  It is the Type 2+ pktheader which has   
   always worked to the node in question before this latest breakage.   
      
   The second (MSGID: 1:153/7001 5ada6f1d) is posted to "Ming the Merciless" with   
   the subject "Pathetic earthlings."  It probably will end up in the uplink's   
   bad area since regular fts-0001.016 pktheaders have never worked there in the   
   past and there is no reason known to 1:153/7001 that it will succeed in being   
   seen beyond 1:153/7715.   
      
   I've also tried Type 2.2 pktheaders and they also worked to that node but did   
   not send a packed message using that pktheader format this time.  It was one   
   of the few nodes where Type 2.2 pktheaders actually worked.   
      
   There are backups of the two packed ASIAN_LINK MSGs if you, or anyone, in this   
   echo requests them to the working fts-0001.016 compliant uplink which would   
   reveal itself in the PATH at the bottom of this officially sanctioned,   
   fts-0001.016 compliant packed MSG.   
      
   Thank you in advance for you kind attention in this most sensitive matter.   
      
   End transmission.   
      
   ... Preudhomme's Law of Window Cleaning: It's on the other side.   
   --- GNU bash, version 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-silvermont-linux-gnu)   
    * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)