-=> Quoting Maurice Kinal to Nancy Backus on 06-Nov-2017 16:39 <=-   
      
    NB>> no matter what the date-time stamp, It was indeed done right at   
    NB>> 9pm EST   
      
    MK> Looks like the BBS is using UTC since it arrived here long before   
    MK> 02:22:54 EST.  If so it appears it got posted rougly 23 miinutes later   
    MK> which is good timing all things considered.    
      
   That is quite possible...  to add to the confusion, my machine isn't   
   running particularly accurate time to begin with, it's EST but a bit   
   fast, which I never bother to change when we go onto EDST... if it runs   
   fast enough, I'll correct it back some...  :)   And then, I didn't post   
   the package to the BBS until a little after the actual toast and all...   
      
    MK> I definetly have the advantage of being able to post directly to the   
    MK> BBS so that the msg header's datetime was 02:00:00 (UTC) and the extra   
    MK> special datetime stamp was -={ Sun Nov  5 21:00:00 EST 2017 }=-.   
      
   You do indeed have an advantage there.... and I did notice the ES   
   datetime stamp...  :)   
      
    MK> I doubt I can get more accurate than that.    
      
   No... that was pretty exact....  :)   
      
   ttyl        neb   
      
   ... Mufflers don't die...they just get exhausted.   
      
   --- EzyBlueWave V3.00 01FB001F   
    * Origin: Tiny's BBS - http://www.tinysbbs.com (1:229/452)