Richard Webb wrote in a message to Dallas Hinton:   
      
      
   DH> He's not in the Nodelist -- but I don't know if he ever was!    
      
    RW>   NEver really looked.  tHis points up another reason   
    RW> why I keep arguing that admin stuff, or quasi official   
    RW> functions such as the echolist should be addressable by   
    RW> FIdonet primarily, even if by routed mail only.  Makes no   
    RW> sense to have a moderator of a backboned echo who does not   
    RW> participate in FIdonet, even as a user on somebody's system, but   
    RW> that's a topic for another echo.   
      
      
   The echolist is NOT part of Fidonet, so you can wish all you want...   
      
   As far as I know, there is no requirement that a moderator have a node   
   number.  Many echoes were and are moderated by users of a BBS.   
      
      
   cya,   
   thom   
   http://www.echolist.net/    
   --- GEcho 1.20/Pro   
    * Origin: Home of The Other Robot (1:261/1352)