Hi! Björn,   
      
   On 29/11/2014 12:37 PM, you wrote:   
      
    BF>     I've so far focused on Argus. It's still the original, very elegant   
    BF> source. But what additions (but a lot of added bugs) do y'all think that   
    BF> Radius has?   
      
   Radius has some slightly better nodelist parsing ability.  (That could be the   
   Nodelist Compiler bugfix by Alex in 2004.[shrug])  Of course, its biggest   
   advantage is the treatment of semaphores: having both a dedicated directory,   
   and the ability to add custom-designed semaphores.   
      
    BF>     I tend to stay with Argus. It's so much easier to maintain, and I   
    BF> don't see any real advantages with Radius, really.   
      
   Stay with what you feel is better.  I too appreciate good 'style' in coding.    
   Argus by another name, by your hand, could a Good Thing.  8-)   
      
   P.S. When the time of general introduction of IPv6 comes, I will be switching   
   to Linux.  I may have an XP VirtualBox or two but I would have to redo all of   
   my batch scripts.  I've already done similar things in bash scripts, with just   
   a couple of other tools to add in later.   
      
   Cheers,   
   Paul.   
      
   --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0   
    * Origin: Paul's Puppy 4.2.1 multiuser vBox - M'boro, Qld, OZ (3:640/1384)