> Hello, Bob!   
    >   
    > 07 Jan 16 10:05, from Bob Seaborn -> Holger Granholm:   
    >   
    >BS>       Well, I do also have a fusion and a dmr rig, but don't play with   
    >BS> them all that much.  I do much prefer the audo quality of D-STAR.   
    >   
    > Really??   
      
      
         Yes, absolutely! I do have rigs for all three, and fusion is close to   
   D-STAR, but I'd say that dmr has a way to go.  Mind you, I'm using them all   
   with a DV4Mini, as we only have D-STAR and fusion repeaters within range here.   
      
      
    >   
    > D-Star uses the older AMBE vocoder while DMR and Fusion use AMBE+2.   
    > Fusion can also use more Bandwidth for the Vocoder compared to D-Star   
    > and DMR.   
    >   
    > So D-Star should sound clearly worse than any other of the mentioned   
    > techniques.   
    > It should also be much more affected by the R2D2 effect (bad audio when   
    > you have high bit error rates).   
    >   
    > Than again I only have DMR and FM, so I cannot really compare.   
    >   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
                          .....Bob, VE5XEF   
      
      
   --- GEcho/32 & IM 2.50   
    * Origin: DE VE5XEF (1:140/12)