Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    AMATEUR_RADIO    |    Ham radio for when Armageddon strikes    |    2,531 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 82 of 2,531    |
|    Ed Vance to RICHARD WEBB    |
|    Boat Anchors    |
|    15 Apr 12 18:10:00    |
      RW>hello Ed,       Hi Richare,              RW>On Wed 2012-Apr-04 22:06, Ed Vance (1:2320/105.1) wrote to AL KAISER:              RW>AK>I was in the service and used the R-390s. They were a great receiver.        Eve       RW>AK>though they were an AM receiver, if you turned the BFO on and then set       the       RW>AK>offset + or - about 1 KC you could listen to SSB with them. I spent many       RW>AK>Late Watches just DXing the bands with the big receiving antennas in       Puert       RW>AK>Rico on a spare receiver while waiting for traffic to come in.              RW>EV> IMHO there is nothing wrong with turning on the BFO on a 'AM' RX.              RW>EV> My first RX was a Hallicrafters S-38E, it had a switch to turn on a       RW>EV> BFO to listen to CW or SSB (if you could call the circuitry in the       RW>EV> S-38E a BFO) IIRC it was just a wire routed around some sections in       RW>EV> the chassis that got 'switched in'.              RW>YEp, my first receivers were general coverage types, to       RW>receive cw or ssb one had to engage the bfo. First straight receiver I       owned       RW>which had a usb lsb rx position was a       RW>HEathkit sb-303. I never minded it that much |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca