Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    AMATEUR_RADIO    |    Ham radio for when Armageddon strikes    |    2,531 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 785 of 2,531    |
|    Ed Vance to Damon A. Getsman    |
|    Using AX.25 packet w/olde    |
|    23 Feb 15 12:20:00    |
      02-21-15 08:14 Damon A. Getsman wrote to All about Using AX.25 packet w/olde               DAG> @MSGID: <54E9104C.749.amtradio@capcity2.synchro.net>        DAG> Forgive my naivety in the area, I'm still definitely learning        DAG> the basics in this area (don't even have a rig yet, obviously).        DAG> I was shopping around on Ebay trying to see what might be a        DAG> good set of price ranges to start looking for a used        DAG> transceiver that can work with AX.25. I noticed a whole lot of        DAG> older, more vintage equipment, that appears to be analog, that        DAG> is within the outskirts of my [current] price limitations.              Howdy! Damon,              My only experience with Packet on Ham Radio was by using Digicom with       a circuit connected to my Commodore 64 pc's Cassette Port.              The Ham that helped me get started in Packet used a TNC and the Baycom       program on his 386 pc.              I know that doesn't help You any with OpenBSD but I just had to make       a comment here in case no one else was trying to help You.               DAG> Assuming that the mic in is matched with a line or audio out        DAG> jack (and not just a built in speaker-- though that could be        DAG> worked around easily on this older & bigger equipment), that is        DAG> really all I'd need to work with for AX.25, no? At least if        DAG> it's handled at the kernel level of my machine; I understand        DAG> that for OpenBSD I might need to actually get a modem that'll        DAG> dump the in/out to my serial port.        DAG> Can anybody tell me if there are any inherent limitations of        DAG> this analog equipment that I'm not aware of that'll keep me        DAG> from being able to utilize AX.25 from it? I don't know any,        DAG> but obviously I haven't even taken my test yet; I want to make        DAG> sure that my first system is capable of packet as well as voice        DAG> xmission.              Before I ran Packet, I used a Netronics ASCII/Video board with their       Keyboard connected to a 555 Audio Oscillator circuit going to the Mike       Connector of either my 2M VHF FM rig or my HF SSB rig, and a circuit       for a RTTY Demodulator that I found in a Popular Electronics magazine       that was connected to the Earphone Jack of either rig.              I had 10 turn POTS to make Audio Frequency changes to the Demodulator       Mark and Space settings that I used for RTTY on VHF so I could change       it when I used it on the HF rig.              I had two POTS on the 555 circuit board to adjust the Mark and Space       settings for either VHF or HF use.              I used the Standard Mark and Space frequencies when I was on the 2M rig       but learned that I could use my own frequency settings on the HF SSB rig.              After I built the circuits I tuned my HF radio to the frequency that       W1AW's RTTY broadcasts were made on.       When the broadcast started I turned the Mark POT on my Demodulator to       get the Mark LED blinking, and did the same for the Space POT until       I could see the broadcast plainly on my TV Set.              After the broadcast was over, and before I keyed the transmitter to       send a CQ, I turned the POTS on the 555 circuit - while either pressing       my telegraph key or releasing it - to get the LEDs on the Demodulator       to light up.              Then I keyed up the HF rig and typed CQ on that frequency and another       station answered me.              That is how I had my first RTTY QSO.               DAG> The one I was just looking at, for instance, was a National        DAG> NCX-200 w/matching power supply.        DAG> Thanks for your time!              I'm not familiar with that rig, sorry can't help You with that.       Although I know National made some very fine equipment.              The High School I went to had a Ham Shack that used a National NC-183d       Receiver.       After I got interested in Amateur Radio I got a Hallicrafter S-38E.              There isn't Any Comparison between what I had at home and the Schools       National Receiver, all I could do was drool wishing I could afford       something better than what I had.              Years later I got a used Hallicrafter SX-42 for my shack.       73 and wish You well with what You choose.              ... To excel at what you do, you must love doing it.       --- MultiMail/MS-DOS v0.49       --- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux        * Origin: telnet & http://cco.ath.cx - Dial-Up: 502-875-8938 (1:2320/105.1)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca