RW> TW> I have one of the antennas I am talking about on my roof constructed   
   RW> TW> from the Pure Origional LDPA theory drawing,   
      
   RW>You mean the schematic of such an antenna. Pure LPDA is built with two   
   RW>booms and follows a formula, which is where the LP comes from.   
      
   All antannas are built form some Schematic or theory Drawing aren't   
   they?   
      
   Well when you stand above the antenna I am talking about it looks just   
   like the theory drawing and uses the Same Formulas of the LPDA antenna   
   so how can it NOT be an LPDA antenna?   
      
   As I mentioned the Two boom implimation was only used to make the   
   antenna easier and cheaper to manfacturer.   
   But no all manfacturers did so.   
      
   And it is Not the booms that make it a "Dipole Array" but the dipoles   
   themselves differing in size and all being connected to the feed line   
   ---   
    þ SLMR 2.1a þ Typo Tom Strkes Again   
    * Origin: Fidonet Since 1991 bbs.docsnetservices.com (1:123/140)