Greetings TOM!   
      
      
    RW> TW>> The twin bom antennas is called a "Real World" LPDA   
      
    RW>> 'Real World' can and is used to describe a lot of things. That   
    RW>> doesn't change when we're talking about antennas.   
      
    TW>> becasue it is much easer to construct. But Both use the same Theory   
    TW>> and give the same Results   
      
    RW>> That's debateable.   
      
    TW> Not This Time Roy, not at all.   
      
   Where's your link to such a build?   
      
    TW> What i am desctibing is build directly using the LPDA antenna Theory   
    TW> Drawing on hte Internet.   
      
   Link?   
      
    TW> And is an Absolute copy Theory Wise as what you are talking about   
    TW> except for the using of a single boom with all the elements insulated   
    TW> from the boom and uses wiring in place of the Two Booms which perfom   
    TW> the same purpose as the wireing in the antenna I am talking about   
      
   That isn't LPDA theory...LPD antennas include the boom as an active part   
   of the antenna. What you've done is isolate the boom(s) from being an   
   active part of the antenna and only using the dipoles. I really can't see   
   building such a monster, when it is so much easier to build a LPDA...   
      
      
       Have a day!   
      
            R\%/itt - K5RXT   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012   
   --- D'Bridge 3.99   
    * Origin: HAM Radio, aka Amateur Radio. 804? Over! (1:387/22)