Greetings TOM!   
      
    RW> RW>>> No, they're mirrors and orchestra leaders. I think of your   
    RW> RW>>> version of reflectors as RF image deflectors and your directors   
    RW> RW>>> as RF guidence   
      
    RW> HG>> You do have the right to your own opinion and nomenclature.   
      
    RW>> You have to admit that the definition of 'reflector' and 'director'   
    RW>> are more suited for general discussion of other things, not antenna   
    RW>> oriented.   
      
    RW>> i.e. if you want to discuss antennas, then the use of 'RF Reflector'   
    RW>> and 'RF director' would be more suited for antenna discussion. In   
    RW>> this media, saying what you mean is more important than ever.   
      
    TW> Since this is a HAM echo and plain "Director" and "Reflector" are   
    TW> standard daily use HAM termonoligy why should they be less   
    TW> accecptable?   
      
   Because we wern't discussing Radio antennas, we were discussing TV   
   antennas? My point is that defining what you're talking about, even in a   
   HAM oriented echo is just as important as 'assuming' the subject is about   
   antennas.   
      
      
       Have a day!   
      
            R\%/itt - K5RXT   
      
   --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012   
   --- D'Bridge 3.99   
    * Origin: HAM Radio, aka Amateur Radio. 804? Over! (1:387/22)