RW> RW> RW>>> Not on an analog station.   
      
   RW> RW> TW>> I am not talking abuut secondary Audio but Multiplexing of TV   
   RW> RW> TW>> signals on a digital Tv Transmitter.   
      
   RW> RW>> That's what I said.   
      
   RW> RW> RW> TW>>> The more channels of course means lower broadcast quality.   
   RW> RW> RW> TW>>> Here is a bit form the Internet:   
      
   RW> RW> RW> TW>>> Trinity Broadcasting Network stations has five SDTV   
   RW> RW> RW> TW>>> channels, the most of any large broadcaster in the country.   
      
   RW> RW> RW>>> We have the same 5 Trinity channels in San Antonio...now what?   
      
   RW> RW> TW>> IF they are multiplexing you can get more than 5 TV signals from   
   RW> RW> TW>> those 5 transmitters.   
      
   RW> RW>> Doubt it. That would be pushing the envelope too far and they'd be   
   RW> RW>> xmitting out of their allocated band frequency. As a HAM or HAM   
   RW> RW>> advocate, you should know that the very idea of xmitting on the edge   
   RW> RW>> of a band will get you in trouble with the FCC.   
      
      
   RW> TW> Well there are stations doing it. Both Ch 8 & 10 here trasnmit   
   RW> TW> additional TV signals in addition to their Main Programing.   
      
   RW>Well, you do know that they don't transmit that programming on the edge of   
   RW>their allocated bandwidth, don't you?   
      
   i NEVER said NOR implied that. IF you would go back you would see I   
   said the main channel definition had to be reduced IF subchannels are   
   transmitted   
      
   ---   
    þ SLMR 2.1a þ Typo Tom strikes agaoin   
    * Origin: TECHWARE BBS -  Since 1995  -  www.techware.dynip.com  (1:102/401)