Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    AMATEUR_RADIO    |    Ham radio for when Armageddon strikes    |    2,531 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 348 of 2,531    |
|    Holger Granholm to Tom Walker    |
|    Re: Resurrected    |
|    14 Apr 14 09:18:00    |
      In a message dated 04-13-14, Tom Walker said to Roy Witt:              Howdy Tom and all,              RW>I used to think that way when I was an experimenting CBer c1965, chasing a       RW>high SWR with coax lengths in intervals of 'wavelengths' and parts       RW>thereof.              TW>BUT it CAN be done. And while the point may be arguable I suspect       TW>that WHEN YOU find the Perfect length it would be less loss than THE       TW>BALUN              You are only fooling yourself, the SWR meter and the transmitter that       there is a low SWR. The fact is that the antenna is still not matched       to 50 ohms and you cannot tune the antenna with any sort of "antenna       tuner". The same bad old SWR still exists along the feeding cable.              The antenna tuner is a misnomer since what it actually is is an       "Impedance matching network". Tuning the antenna has to be done       at the antenna itself.              73 de Sam, OH0NC              aka Holger              ___        * MR/2 2.30 * If cows have HORNS, why do they MOO rather than HONK?                     --- PCBoard (R) v15.22 (OS/2) 2        * Origin: Coming to you from the Sunny Aland Islands. (2:20/228)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca