On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, Holger Granholm wrote to Mark Lewis:   
      
   ml>you just nailed the exact reason why spell checkers are only one   
   ml>part of the equation... grammar checkers are also highly desired...   
   ml>some grammar checkers use a spell checker as they run but generally,   
   ml>it should be a two pass scenario... one for the spelling and one for   
   ml>the grammar... the grammar pass may turn up additional mis-spellings   
   ml>which can be corrected then ;)   
      
    HG> I agree but if spell checkers are large (byte wise) a grammar   
    HG> checker will certainly be huge   
      
   i don't think so... a grammar checker only needs the rules of the language...   
   not all the words ;)   
      
    HG> and will also slow down the output considerably.   
      
   slow it down how? you manually execute a grammar checker when you want to...   
   it doesn't run all the time like so many programs do with their built-in spell   
   checking these days...   
      
    HG> The best grammar checker is built-in into your head by reading a    
    HG> lot of books and other literature in your youth.   
      
   agreed for the most part ;)   
      
   )\/(ark   
      
   One of the great tragedies of life is the murder of a beautiful theory by a   
   gang of brutal facts. --Benjamin Franklin   
      
   --- FMail/Win32 1.60   
    * Origin:  (1:3634/12.71)