Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    AMATEUR_RADIO    |    Ham radio for when Armageddon strikes    |    2,531 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 287 of 2,531    |
|    mark lewis to Roy Witt    |
|    ARRL W1AW Code Practi    |
|    21 Feb 14 07:11:01    |
       On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Roy Witt wrote to mark lewis:               HG>> There are many words that differ by just one letter in the word        HG>> that have a different meaning but are accepted by the spell checker        HG>> because they are correctly spelled but gramatically faulty in the        HG>> context.               ml> you just nailed the exact reason why spell checkers are only one part        ml> of the equation... grammar checkers are also highly desired... some        ml> grammar checkers use a spell checker as they run but generally, it        ml> should be a two pass scenario... one for the spelling and one for the        ml> grammar... the grammar pass may turn up additional mis-spellings        ml> which can be corrected then ;)               RW> Actually, MS-Word has both of those features, but I seldom use it.              i use spell checkers only when i'm not sure of a word or it just doesn't look       right... when i was using word, i used the grammer checker quite a lot...       especially when tuning the document to different reader levels... some       documents were meant for lower and middle school targets while other documents       were directed at scientific and higher education targets... outside of tuning       the document for the target's reading level, i used the grammer checker to       make sure i didn't miss things like using two or too where to was proper... we       already know that a spell checker doesn't verify that the word is used       properly ;)               RW> I normally don't run a spell checker, but do access an online        RW> dictionary when I'm in doubt. Sometimes my version of spelling a        RW> word can't be found because it isn't there. But it will suggest        RW> words spelled similarly that one can look up and perhaps use to        RW> find the word you were looking for. Or it will make a suggestion        RW> that offers a different spelling.              i do that from time to time, too... uncle google is very knowing O:)              )\/(ark               * Origin: (1:3634/12)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca