Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    AMATEUR_RADIO    |    Ham radio for when Armageddon strikes    |    2,531 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 219 of 2,531    |
|    Roy Witt to Eric Hutchins    |
|    Ham Radio Promo    |
|    16 Feb 13 12:25:40    |
      Eric Hutchins wrote to Roy Witt:               >> Not at all. If it weren't for the demise of the code test, CBers        >> wouldn't be applying for a license.               EH> I don't understand why someone would be against the no-code test.              I've never been against no-code. I belonged to the W5YI team that fought       to get rid of it because it is an inefficient use of the bands. Besides       that, every radio service in existance dropped CW communications before       the FCC decided to drop the Amateur test.               EH> I was a no code tech, and then I passed my General, but could not get        EH> passed the code part, so I stayed a no-code tech until the        EH> requirement for the code was dropped. I re-tested and passed (again),        EH> and now I am studying for my Extra class.              Why bother, you'll never be using the 25khz of HF that is CW only       bandwidth.               EH> Would you rather let the hobby languish and disappear than be        EH> invigorated with new hams?              I would prefer that new Hams were at least curtious enough to learn the       ropes before thinking they're somehow contributing to the hobby when       they're rude, don't know operating procedure and think that just because       they have a 6 in their callsign that they're god's gift to radio.               EH> besides, most new hams I have heard on the air, are much more        EH> appreciative of the privileges that the so called 'original' hams.              I've seen both good and bad new Hams.               >> If you have the mind capable of memorizing every aspecet of the        >> written test, that's not a bad thing. Hardly anyone I knew during my        >> early years was able to test without some memorizing.        >>        >> TW> And I suspect the REACT people like them also.        >>        >> Thanks for making my case.               EH> I was a member of REACT for over 25 years and in all that time, I        EH> would put many of my fellow members up against any hams that looked        EH> down their noses at us.              I wouldn't. I monitor the REACT channels and the trucker channels and       frankly, I can't tell the difference, as they all cuss and swear at each       other and step all over each other. They all think that each owns the       channels they use. What is really ironic is that most of these people are       from out of state and they're traveling on freeways that my taxes paid to       build. Not theirs.               EH> We were all after the same thing, public service.              I live between I-10 and I-35 here in Texas and there isn't any such thing       on the CB channels. A lot of talk, cussing out local drivers who drive too       slow, or use the middle lane like the truckers own it.                      R\%/itt                     --- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-31012        * Origin: Texas Lone-Star - Texan, American, USAian (1:387/22)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca