From: mars1933@hotmail.com

From The Council of Conservative Citizens:

One of the most important aspects of 20th century politics has been
the almost complete surrender by people of European background of
their economic position and social status within their traditional
living spaces of Europe and North America. As an example, during the
so called "civil rights" movement era, the ability of people of
European background to decide who they want to associate with was
taken away by all three branches of the federal government in less
than 10 years. The Supreme Court Case Brown vs. Board of Education
forced white people to send their children to black areas with
increased levels of crime as of 1964 outlawed the ability of people of
European background to express any preference for members of their
group in hiring decisions. With the exception of whites in the South,
there was relatively little resistance by most white Americans to the
liberal agenda.

The lack of resistance by white Americans to their decline in social
status and economic position has many complicated causes. It can
partly be attributed to the flawed nature of our own social heritage.
Christianity and liberalism both claim to be universal ideologies.
They both claim that all human beings are of equal moral worth and
that the ideal for politics is a cosmopolitan political community, in
which everyone is a full and equal citizen regardless of their racial
or cultural background. These ideologies undermine the ability of
people of European background to develop for themselves the belief
that it is a legitimate act for whites to favor members of their own
group.

The lack of resistance by white Americans to the decline of their
social status and economic position within their traditional homelands
can also be attributed to the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt
School. These people as well forced white people to accept blacks
moving into their neighborhoods. By treating Western Culture as an
ideology whose only purpose is to justify the oppression and
exploitation of non-whites, the Cultural Marxists have been able to
undermine any sense of exceptionalism that people of European
background have about themselves. This is why there is nothing more
hateful than a white liberal. These people hate themselves and their
own civilization.

 Since people of European background have no sense of exceptionalism
and no sense that it is a legitimate act for them to prefer members of
their own social group, the "concept of "white privilege" dominates
the political discourse on race in the United States and every other
Western nation. This is largely due to the fact that liberals dominate
the opinion forming institutions of Western societies such as the
universities and the media. Liberals are able to impose an
interpretation of public policy issues and political conflicts on
society that reflects their values and their assumptions about the
social world. This has allowed modern liberalism to attain the status
of a hegemonic ideology within the West. Central to modern
liberalism's worldview is a radical egalitarian ideology that claims
that all human beings are mechanically equal. Liberals want to pretend
that it is only environmental factors that influence people's
behavior. Therefore, liberals claim that all of the accomplishments of
white Americans are illegitimate because they are due to some unfair
advantage such as slavery or segregation. This allows liberals to
claim without any opposition that any disparity in achievement between
whites and other groups must be due to "structural racism." Since
liberals monopolize the opinion forming institutions of society, they
do not have to entertain other explanations for why there is a
disparity in accomplishments between whites and others such as a
hereditary component to cognitive mental ability. They can claim that
the only acceptable opinion requires compensatory education and other
redistributionist social policies until equality of outcome is
achieved. The fact that this involves discrimination against white
people is barely addressed in our media.

Although the so called "civil rights" movement was able to
successfully take away white people's freedom of association, liberals
were not satisfied with the damage that they had done to the United
States. In a short period of time liberals began to change their
focus. Liberals began to support racial classifications as long as the
racial classification worked against white people. Like the pigs in
Orwell's animal farm claiming that all animals are equal but some are
more equal than others, liberals began to claim that in order to treat
everyone equally, blacks must be given preferential treatment. Then
liberals wanted to use the coercive apparatus of the welfare state to
undermine the social status and economic position of white Americans
even further. One of the policies that liberals used to accomplish
this goal was affirmative action. Liberals began to develop policies
that favored blacks in employment and educational opportunities at the
expense of more qualified white people almost as soon as the 1964
Civil Rights Bill was passed. Presidents Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson
issued executive orders requiring quotas in hiring minorities in order
for private contractors to get government contracts. The Supreme Court
in a variety of cases has interpreted the Constitution and the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 in a manner that allows the government to
discriminate against white people and use affirmative action as an
entitlement program. However, because liberals still control the
opinion forming institutions of society, even when they are
discriminating against white people, liberals are still able to create
an interpretation of the social world that prevents people from seeing
their real agenda.

The 1971 Supreme Court case, Griggs Vs Duke Power Company, is an
example of how liberals rig the system to make it easy for minorities
to sue for discrimination. In this case, the Supreme Court
reinterpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights act to mean that anytime
that there are disparities in outcome between blacks and whites, it
must be evidence of discrimination against black people. In this case
a power company set certain standards for being employed at the
nuclear power plant such as requiring janitors to have a high school
education. However, the Supreme Court ruled that this violated Title
VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964 because requiring a high school
diploma for janitors had an adverse impact on blacks being hired
within the power plant. This is the legal doctrine of disparate
impact. It assigns responsibility on the employer to prove that they
are not guilty of discrimination, if there is a disparity in outcomes
between different racial groups in society. To infer evidence of
discrimination from unequal group outcomes, the EEOC uses employment

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)