Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ALL-POLITICS    |    Politics Unlimited    |    26,388 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,984 of 26,388    |
|    Mike Powell to ALAN IANSON    |
|    Re: Trump Revelation    |
|    05 Nov 24 10:38:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 21498.allpol@1:2320/105 2b8fc80b       REPLY: 1:153/757.0 2a514247       PID: Synchronet 3.20a-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 202 GCC 12.2.0       TID: SBBSecho 3.20-Linux master/acc19483f Apr 26 2024 23:04 GCC 12.2.0       BBSID: CAPCITY2       CHRS: ASCII 1       > > At least three times since 1973, the Democrats have had a majority in       > > Congress and held the White House, yet they did nothing to codify abortion       > > rights even though they ran on that issue multiple times.              > Supreme court justices Kavanaugh and Barret both said that Roe v Wade was       > precedent and settled law when they had their hearings, so why codify it?              The short answer is to make it more permanent.              The long answer is because precedent can be overturned by a later court       interpretation. An example would be a case that introduces some other legal       question or precedent that previously-questioned SC candidates had not       considered.              If it is codified into law in a manner that is Constitutional and doesn't       violate any pre-existing laws, it is much less likely to be overturned by a       later court interpretation.              > I don't see abortion as a political issue, it is a matter of health care for       > women. I don't think we need laws that block a womans right to privacy or       > health care.              I don't necessarily either but, for many, many years now, both parties have       made it so, and the Democrats in particular have campaigned as the       champions of this issue. Yet, when given opportunities to fix it once and       for all, they not only failed but they didn't even *attempt* to do so!              > > Should we not vote for those sorts of politicians, too?              > Democrats seem to be standing for a womens right to privacy and abortion. On       > that issue the democrats seem to be the only choice.              Why would you believe them now? Kamala is campaigning on similar terms...       making abortion permanently legal nationally... that just about every       previous Democrat in my adult lifetime has campaigned on. When given the       chance, *NONE* of them did *anything* to protect womens' rights beyond lip       service.                      * SLMR 2.1a * I am wealthy in my friends. -Shakespeare       --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux        * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)       SEEN-BY: 10/0 1 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 104/119 105/81 106/201 116/17       SEEN-BY: 116/18 120/616 123/10 124/5016 128/187 153/757 7715 154/10       SEEN-BY: 154/30 50 700 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215 501 601 700 720 810       SEEN-BY: 218/840 850 860 870 880 900 930 940 220/90 221/0 6 226/18       SEEN-BY: 226/30 44 50 227/114 229/110 114 206 310 317 426 428 470       SEEN-BY: 229/700 240/1120 5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5006 282/1038       SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 301/1 310/31 320/219 322/757 341/66       SEEN-BY: 341/234 342/200 396/45 423/120 460/58 467/888 633/280 712/848       SEEN-BY: 770/1 2320/0 105 304 401 3634/12 5020/400 5075/35       PATH: 2320/105 154/10 280/464 103/705 218/700 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca