MSGID: 2:221/360.0 5fff3494   
   REPLY: 1:275/99 f8d28dd1   
   PID: Pineapple/OS2 1.3 20201107   
   TID: GE/2 1.2   
   CHRS: CP437 2   
   TZUTC: 0200   
   Hello Aaron,   
      
   >LL>Why have age restrictions at all? We have automatic voter registration   
   >LL>now, so why wait until someone turns 18? We can do it the moment a   
   >LL>baby is born. That way, everybody in America will have the right to   
   >LL>vote, with no more age discrimination. What do you say about that?   
   >   
   >Sounds good! My kids know who to vote against.   
      
   We have to change our ways, and become a pro-life America.   
   And that means being pro-life for everybody. As such, we cannot   
   discriminate against those who are not quite here yet in the   
   real world, by allowing them to have their own say while they   
   are still in their mother's womb awaiting their arrival here.   
   That means pregnant women should be allowed to vote by proxy.   
   One vote per unborn baby. Those carrying quintuplets would   
   get six votes - one for mommy, and five for babies to be.   
      
   --Lee   
      
   --    
   Sleep With Someone New   
   --- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb   
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 124/5016 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6 360 226/30 227/114   
   SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 700 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 261/38   
   SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/464 1038 288/100 292/854 8125 301/1 113   
   SEEN-BY: 310/31 317/3 322/757 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 712/848   
   SEEN-BY: 770/1 801/188 197 202 900/100 106 108 902/6 7 25 26 27 920/1   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 5058/104   
   PATH: 221/360 1 280/464 292/854 301/1 80/1 902/27 90/1 229/426