Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ALL-POLITICS    |    Politics Unlimited    |    26,388 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,423 of 26,388    |
|    Vague to Ron Lauzon    |
|    Re: My nation, America,    |
|    10 Feb 21 18:42:00    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 26.fidonet_allpolit@1:3603/9999 2489ad57       REPLY: 14809.fidoallpolit@1:275/89 248971a7       PID: Synchronet 3.18b-Win32 Sep 20 2020 MSC 1927       TID: SBBSecho 3.11-Win32 r3.177 Sep 20 2020 MSC 1927       CHRS: UTF-8 4       -=> Ron Lauzon wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-               -=> Gregory Deyss wrote to Dale Shipp <=-               GD> You might understand this when and if you pick up the last Time        GD> Magazine. It's all out and is available for all to read.               GD> The secret history of the Shadow Campaign that Saved the 2020 election.               RL> I love the word "Saved". It sounds like it was a good thing to subvert        RL> the will of the American people to put a bunch of ignorante Elites in        RL> power.              Are we talking about Pennsylvania changing their mail-in voting rules? Cool:              In October 2019, the Republican-led Pennsylvania General Assembly passed an       election law, Act 77, that added no-excuse voting by mail, a provision pushed       by Democrats. The act says that any qualified elector who is not eligible to be       an absentee elector can get a mail-in ballot. Republicans got one of their       priorities included too: elimination of straight-ticket voting. The bill drew       supporters from both parties, but it had more support from Republicans.              “It was always touted as a bipartisan effort to get ready for 2020,       pre-pandemic, bring Pennsylvania in line with Florida and Ohio and a bunch of       states that had the no excuse system,” said Edward B. Foley, an Ohio State       University constitutional law professor who specializes in elections.              Act 77 required constitutional challenges be brought within 180 days, but that       didn’t happen. After Trump lost the Nov. 3 election, U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly,       R-Pa., and co-plaintiffs filed a case against state officials arguing that the       mail-in ballot provisions in Act 77 were a violation. Kelly asked the court to       prohibit the certification of results that included mail-in ballots or direct       the Pennsylvania General Assembly to choose electors.              One week later, the state Supreme Court dismissed the petition as untimely,       writing that the plaintiffs filed their case more than a year after Act 77 was       enacted and after millions of residents had already voted in the primary and       general elections. The case was filed as the final ballots “were being       tallied, with the results becoming seemingly apparent,” the court wrote. The       court’s three-page order did not address whether Act 77 and the state       constitution were in conflict.              “It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely       efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters,” Justice David Wecht, a       Democrat, wrote.              Chief Justice Thomas Saylor, a Republican, wrote that throwing out votes at       this point was extreme and untenable: “There has been too much good-faith       reliance, by the electorate, on the no-excuse mail-in voting regime created by       Act 77.”              After losing, Kelly took the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, where an emergency       application for injunctive relief was denied by Justice Samuel Alito Dec. 8.       Kelly is still seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.              Pat Toomey, Pennsylvania’s Republican senator, said many Pennsylvania       lawmakers believe the law is constitutional.              “Clearly the state legislature and governor believe it is consistent with the       state constitution,” Toomey said. “This law wasn’t challenged when it was       passed, it wasn’t challenged when it was applied during the June primary       election. It was only challenged after President Trump lost the general       election.”                     ... Your inability to understand something is not a valid argument against it.       === MultiMail/Win v0.52       --- SBBSecho 3.11-Win32        * Origin: Vague BBS - Vague.ddns.net - Telnet/SSH/RLogin (1:3603/9999)       SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/0 18/0 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 106/127       SEEN-BY: 116/116 120/340 123/0 25 35 40 131 150 170 180 190 755 124/5016       SEEN-BY: 135/300 366 371 379 382 384 385 388 391 153/105 135 757 802       SEEN-BY: 153/6809 7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114       SEEN-BY: 229/101 424 426 700 1016 1017 240/1120 5832 249/206 317 261/38       SEEN-BY: 280/464 5003 282/464 1038 288/100 292/854 8125 300/4 301/1       SEEN-BY: 301/113 310/31 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/17 200 396/45 423/81       SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 712/848 770/1 801/188 197 202 900/100 106       SEEN-BY: 900/108 902/6 7 25 26 27 920/1 2452/250 3634/0 12 15 27 30       SEEN-BY: 3634/50 4500/1 5058/104       PATH: 135/391 300 3634/12 153/757 221/6 1 280/464 292/854 301/1       PATH: 80/1 902/27 90/1 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca