TZUTC: -0700   
   MSGID: 399.fidonet_allpolit@1:104/116 247587bb   
   REPLY: 1:275/99 76457b57   
   PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux HEAD/8b8ed2159 Jan 26 2021 GCC 7.3.1   
   TID: SBBSecho 3.12-Linux HEAD/8b8ed2159 Jan 26 2021 GCC 7.3.1   
   COLS: 80   
   BBSID: CIAD   
   CHRS: ASCII 1   
   NOTE: FSEditor.js v1.104   
     Re: Re: Biden Impeachment   
     By: Aaron Thomas to Brian Klauss on Tue Jan 26 2021 02:12 pm   
      
    >  BK> The claim against Biden is more believable?  Honesty, how or why?   
    >  BK> Biden did nothing illegal as Obama's Vice President and hasn't done a   
    >  BK> single thing illegal as our President.  Trump, on the other hand,   
    >  BK> violated multiple laws and has been impeached twice.   
    >   
    > Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in aid to Ukraine if Zelesnky didn't   
    > fire the country's top prosecutor who was about to prosecute a corruption   
    > scandal involving Hunter's energy company. Hunter would have never been   
    > involved with Burisma Holdings in the first place if Joe wasn't VP.   
      
   As a global leader in ensuring the contiunance of democracy, democratic   
   elections, and prosecuting corruption whenever possible, the threatening to   
   withold aide is something we can and should do.  Hunter Biden was hired onto   
   the board of Burisma Holding to ensure corporate governance best practices   
   (and maybe as a means for father and son to talk about what is happening).  As   
   a lawyer, who is strong in corporate law, it was a logic position for him.    
   Yes, there is the consideration of a conflict of interest, but that never   
   occurred.  Viktor Shokin was removed by the Ukrainian parliament in March 2016.   
      
    > Trump might have abused his power too, by allegedly pressuring Ukraine to   
    > investigate Joe. But Trump has already been tried and was found not guilty.   
    > Now it's time for Joe to go on trial.   
      
   Why?  What did Joe Biden do as Obama's vice president in relation to Ukraine   
   that was illegal?  Your conspiracy theories are perplexing as they make zero   
   logical sense.  If Hunter Biden did anything illegal, he should be tried, not   
   the other way around.   
      
    > You should send Joe a screenshot of your vague banter because that might be   
    > the best thing his defense could come up with.   
      
   You continually make me laugh.  I'm not vague, I'm actually quite verbose.    
   The only thing Joe Biden did was be on the wrong side of Trump's conspiracy   
   theories that hold zero water.   
      
    >  BK> Being opportunistic as payback is ridiculous.  Not only is she wasting   
    >  BK> the time of her colleagues, she continues to float more conspiracy   
    >  BK> theories just for the sake that she wants Trump to remain in office.   
    >   
    > You can't be a Kamala Harris supporter without also supporting a waste of   
    > time.   
      
   Again, the more time you spend floating the idea that Kamala Harris isn't   
   suitable as a Vice President will force me to float the following: she is more   
   qualified to be Vice President than most of Donald Trump's picks for his   
   administration.  Come on, Betsy DeVos or any of his other millio   
   aire/billionaire "swamp creatures".  The only advantage of putting people in   
   power that have no idea what they are doing is to ensure they do whatever   
   their boss says, can ensure the continued lining of their pockets, and are   
   simply disposable as they have more than a sufficient nest egg to fall-back on.   
      
    >  BK> Anyone who can claim a stolen election when a court packed by Donald   
    >  BK> Trump says he has no standing and his claims are baseless is just that,   
    >   
    > I don't think you know what court-packing means. Why don't you google it and   
    > we'll revisit that issue once you've got a better understanding?   
      
   Definition: The practice of changing the number or composition of judges on a   
   court, making it ore favorable to particular goals or ideologies, and   
   typically involving an increase in the number of seats on the court.   
   (dictionary.com - "Court Packing")   
      
   Again, changing the balance of the Supreme Court from centrist to right   
   leaning by appointing three justices is court packing.  His purpose was to   
   ensure the court would side with him.   
      
   Sorry, man, keep floating your conspiracy theories.  You'll lose every time.   
      
   Brian Klauss <-> Dream Master   
   Caught in a Dream | caughtinadream.com a Synchronet BBS   
   --- SBBSecho 3.12-Linux   
    * Origin: Caught in a Dream - caughtinadream.com (1:104/116)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/120 123 14/0 15/0 2 18/0 19/36 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 104/115   
   SEEN-BY: 104/116 105/81 106/127 201 114/224 702 706 709 116/18 116   
   SEEN-BY: 120/331 340 123/0 25 35 40 50 131 140 150 170 180 190 755   
   SEEN-BY: 124/5016 128/2 73 187 253 135/300 153/105 135 757 802 6809   
   SEEN-BY: 153/7715 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6 360 222/2 226/30   
   SEEN-BY: 227/114 229/101 424 426 700 1016 1017 230/150 152 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 307 317 250/1 261/38 100 1466 266/512 267/155   
   SEEN-BY: 275/100 280/464 5003 282/464 1031 1038 1056 288/100 291/100   
   SEEN-BY: 291/111 292/854 8125 300/4 301/1 113 305/1 3 310/2 31 312/2   
   SEEN-BY: 317/3 320/119 219 322/757 335/364 340/400 341/66 342/17 200   
   SEEN-BY: 396/45 423/81 120 460/58 640/1321 712/848 770/1 801/161 188   
   SEEN-BY: 801/189 197 202 900/100 106 108 902/6 7 25 26 27 920/1 2320/105   
   SEEN-BY: 2452/250 3005/1 3634/0 12 15 27 30 50 4500/1 5020/1042 5058/104   
   PATH: 104/116 15/0 261/38 3634/12 153/757 221/6 1 280/464 292/854   
   PATH: 301/1 80/1 902/27 90/1 229/426