Just a sample of the Echomail archive
Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.
|    ALL-POLITICS    |    Politics Unlimited    |    26,388 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 24,276 of 26,388    |
|    Angela Walker to Lee Lofaso    |
|    Weakling    |
|    13 Nov 20 05:07:21    |
      TZUTC: -0500       MSGID: 13977.fidoallpolit@1:129/165 2413c772       REPLY: 2:221/360.0 5f9fe002       PID: Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 Nov 27 2014 MSC 1800       TID: SBBSecho 2.27-Win32 r1.256 Nov 27 2014 MSC 1800        Re: Weakling        By: Lee Lofaso to Alan Ianson on Mon Nov 02 2020 12:31 pm               > Hello Alan,        >         > >BH>What about the rights of the unborn as a human being?        > >        > >I think there are rights all around including the woman who needs to make        > > the decision to abort a pregnancy are not.        >         > In Saudi Arabia, Iran, and many other Islamic countries, women        > have no rights to abortion - or many other rights for that matter.        > So who gets to decide what rights are, and who is deserving to        > have said rights?        >         > --Lee        >         > --        > You're fired, Donald!        >        I guess that depends on who you ask, but I would answer that everyone deserves       certain rights and that it is a damn shame that some people do not. Equality       would be one of those universal rights in my perfect world. It would not be       acceptable to discriminate against anyone, anywhere in the world. Obviously       there's a need for common sense like if a big fat man applied to be an       attendant on an airplane or if an old man with a bad back applied for a very       physically demanding occupation - so you cannot call those things       discrimination - that's more a case of the individual just not being a good fit       for the job and there needs to be a practical allowance for that. However       nobody should be treated differently because of their skin color, sexual       orientation, gender itself, religion, etc.              I think a basic rule of thumb for what's allowed in society should tie back to       whether or not the action in question harms another person - and since we've       been on the topic, no, I'm not counting a fetus as a person. I support law       that recognizes the infant as a person once its taken it's first breath.        Generally speaking, I believe people should have the right (legally speaking)       to cause harm to themselves but not in any significant capacity to others. I       say significant capacity because of the argument that, say, calling someone a       hurtful name could be defined as causing them harm - and again that's another       example of something I feel is immoral and should be looked down upon but       should not be made illegal. We should try to err on the side of allowing       people as much personal freedom as possible within the constraints of stopping       them from causing notable harm to others.              With regard to who gets to make the rules, well that's a bit tougher to answer.       Ultimately the people should make the rules - as in democracy - but obviously       our current system is far from perfect. I wish we all got to vote on far more       of the big issues that come up. Imagine if all Americans, for example, could       log onto a special government website and vote on key issues like which       proposed COVID stimulus package to pass (or whether to pass one at all for that       matter). People could also vote on more localized issues based on where they       live - state government, even local government like whether to approve a       proposed public school budget. We could vote on everything from national law       down to issues that affect just the town we live in. I think that would be       neat! Perhaps a short list of issues to vote on could be submitted at each       level of government - national, state, and local - and then citizens have one       month to vote. Then next month you do it again. I fear anything more than a       few key issues at each level, once a month, would become way too daunting       really fast though! Oh, and obviously there should be retained certain core       laws of the land and rights of the individual that cannot ever be usurped by       vote. For example, you cannot let the people vote that it's now legal to shoot       and kill anyone they want on Wednesdays :)       --- SBBSecho 2.27-Win32        * Origin: Battlestar BBS : battlestarbbs.dyndns.org (1:129/165)       SEEN-BY: 1/19 123 14/0 15/0 16/0 19/36 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 105/81       SEEN-BY: 106/201 114/201 116/18 120/331 340 123/130 131 140 124/5009       SEEN-BY: 124/5016 129/12 102 125 160 165 328 153/7715 154/10 203/0       SEEN-BY: 203/124 218/700 221/0 1 6 222/2 226/30 227/114 229/101 424       SEEN-BY: 229/426 700 1016 1017 230/0 150 152 240/1120 5832 249/206       SEEN-BY: 249/317 250/1 261/1 38 100 220 1466 266/75 512 618 267/152       SEEN-BY: 267/154 155 275/100 280/464 5003 282/464 1031 1038 1056 288/100       SEEN-BY: 291/100 111 292/854 8125 301/1 113 310/31 317/3 320/119 219       SEEN-BY: 320/319 322/0 757 340/400 341/66 342/200 396/45 423/120 640/1321       SEEN-BY: 712/848 770/1 801/161 188 189 197 202 900/100 106 108 902/6       SEEN-BY: 902/7 25 26 27 920/1 2320/105 2452/250 3634/12 24 5020/1042       SEEN-BY: 5058/104       PATH: 129/165 266/512 261/38 320/219 203/0 280/464 292/854 301/1       PATH: 80/1 902/27 90/1 229/426           |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca