home bbs files messages ]

Just a sample of the Echomail archive

Cooperative anarchy at its finest, still active today. Darkrealms is the Zone 1 Hub.

   ALL-POLITICS      Politics Unlimited      26,388 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 24,200 of 26,388   
   Alan Ianson to Aaron Thomas   
   Re: Pence-Harris Debate   
   08 Oct 20 23:02:28   
   
   MSGID: 1:153/757.2 603d63a6   
   REPLY: 1:229/426 3580A920   
   TZUTC: -0700   
   CHARSET: LATIN-1   
   >> How can she? Republicans have not (yet) passed Amy Coney Barrett into the   
   >> supreme court. When/if they do then the democrats will do what they need to   
      
   > I suppose there's some way to add more seats to the court, and with those new   
   > seats added, a Democrat president (or any president) can go ahead and fill   
   > them up accordingly.   
      
   That is one possibility. There is no limit to the number of judges that can   
   sit on the supreme court. I think it would be a shame if the number had to   
   grow because of the because republicans try to pack the supreme court with   
   conservative justices who would kill Roe v. Wade. Amy Coney Barrett signed an   
   ad supporting the end of the "barbaric" (her words)  Roe v. wade decision.   
      
   I am pro life but I think the decision a woman makes regarding her unborn   
   child is best made by herself in consultation with her family and doctor.   
   Legislators are unneeded in that decision/process.   
      
   There is also the decision regarding the Trump administrations desire to kill   
   the ACA that will be in the courts November 10. A packed conservative supreme   
   court decision could devastate both of those cases and Americans generally for   
   years to come.    
      
   > Joe Biden should come out and say "I won't do that," but instead, he keeps   
   > his fans happy with the idea that maybe he will do that, but then after the   
   > election, he can throw those people's ambition down the drain.   
      
   Joe Biden likely does not want to increase the number of justices.   
      
   >> The dirtiest detail of it is that she tried to dodge the question; so   
   >> Americans can find out after the fact.   
      
   The ball is in republican hands at the moment.   
       
   >> Americans are well aware of all the facts around the nomination.   
      
   > Sure, but they're not aware of Biden & Harris' intentions regarding   
   > court-packing.   
      
   It's not their game right now. We'll have to let the republicans do whatever   
   it is they do and we go from there.   
   --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-4   
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)   
   SEEN-BY: 1/123 14/0 80/1 88/0 90/1 103/705 105/81 120/340 123/131   
   SEEN-BY: 153/0 105 135 757 802 6809 154/10 203/0 218/700 221/0 1 6   
   SEEN-BY: 221/360 226/30 227/114 229/101 424 426 700 1016 1017 240/1120   
   SEEN-BY: 240/5832 249/206 317 261/38 280/464 5003 282/464 1038 288/100   
   SEEN-BY: 292/854 8125 301/1 113 310/31 317/3 322/757 335/364 342/17   
   SEEN-BY: 342/200 396/45 423/81 120 712/848 770/1 801/188 197 202 900/100   
   SEEN-BY: 900/106 108 902/6 7 25 26 27 920/1 2452/250 3634/12 4500/1   
   SEEN-BY: 5058/104   
   PATH: 153/757 221/6 1 280/464 292/854 301/1 80/1 902/27 90/1 229/426   
      

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca